Leatherman v. City of Eureka et al

Filing 9

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 8 Stipulation to Extend Case Deadlines. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Peter E. Martin, SBN 121672 peter@martinmacklaw.com Shelley K. Mack, SBN 209596 shelley@martinmacklaw.com Martin & Mack LLP 1369 G Street Arcata, California 95521 Tel: (707) 268-0445 Fax: (707) 667-0318 Attorneys for Plaintiff OSCAR LEATHERMAN 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 OSCAR LEATHERMAN, ) CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05610-HSG 4 ) ) STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE Plaintiff, ) DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER ) vs. ) ) ) CITY OF EUREKA, EUREKA POLICE ) DEPARTMENT, and STEVE WATSON, in ) his official capacity as Interim Chief of Police, ) ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 0 STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER OSCAR LEATHERMAN v. CITY OF EUREKA et al., Case No. 4 3:17-cv-05610-HSG 1 2 3 4 Plaintiff Oscar Leatherman ( “Plaintiff” or “Mr. Leatherman”) filed the above-referenced action on or about September 28, 2017. On September 29, 2017, this Court issued its Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, instructing the parties to file their Joint Initial Case Management 5 Conference Statement on or before December 26, 2017, and setting an initial case management 6 7 conference for 2:00 p.m. on January 2, 2018. Pursuant to the Court’s Order of September 29, 8 2017 and Rule 26(a)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties’ Rule 26 initial 9 disclosures are presently due to be served on or before December 26, 2017. 10 On September 29, 2017, by and through their attorney of record, Cyndy Day-Wilson, 11 12 Defendants City of Eureka, Eureka Police Department, and Steve Watson, in his official capacity 13 as Chief of Police (collectively hereinafter, “Defendants”), requested an extension of time to and 14 through November 7, 2017 in order to respond to Mr. Leatherman’s Complaint. Plaintiff’s 15 counsel of record, Shelley K. Mack, granted Defendants’ request for an extension of time the 16 same day. 17 18 Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the extension of time 19 granted on September 29, 2017, Defendants are currently due to file an answer or other 20 responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before November 7, 2017. 21 On November 2, 2017, Plaintiff, through his attorney of record, Shelley K. Mack, 22 notified Defendants, through their attorney of record, Eureka City Attorney Cyndy Day-Wilson, 23 24 that he wishes to file a First Amended Complaint. Counsel for the parties conferred on 25 November 6, 2017, and in order to make the most efficient use of the parties’ resources and 26 avoid duplicative proceedings before this Court, agreed as follows: 27 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants 28 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER OSCAR LEATHERMAN v. CITY OF EUREKA et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-05610-HSG 4 1 respectively, through their attorneys of record, that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will be filed on or before December 7, 2017. 3 2. Defendants shall file their responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s First Amended 4 Complaint on or before January 12, 2018. 5 3. The parties agree that the Initial Case Management Conference in the above6 7 captioned action shall be held no less than thirty (30) days after the Court rules on any 8 motion to dismiss filed by Defendants, or no less than thirty (30) days after 9 Defendants file an answer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (whichever is 10 appropriate). 11 12 4. The parties further agree to serve Rule 26 initial disclosures no less than seven (7) 13 days before the Initial Case Management Conference, as rescheduled pursuant to this 14 Stipulation. 15 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 Respectfully Submitted, 18 19 20 Dated: November 8, 2017 By: /s/ Shelley K. Mack ___________________________ Peter E. Martin Shelley K. Mack Attorneys for Plaintiff OSCAR LEATHERMAN Dated: November 8, 2017 By: /s/ Cyndy Day-Wilson __________________________________ Cyndy Day-Wilson, Eureka City Attorney Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF EUREKA, EUREKA POLICE DEPARTMENT, and STEVE WATSON, in his official capacity as interim Chief of Police 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER OSCAR LEATHERMAN v. CITY OF EUREKA et al., Case No. 4 3:17-cv-05610-HSG ORDER 1 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint in this matter be 3 4 filed on or before December 7, 2017, and Defendants shall file their responsive pleading to 5 Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint on or before January 12, 2018. 6 7 8 9 10 The Initial Case Management Conference in the above-captioned action shall be held no IT IS SO ORDERED. less than thirty (30) days after the Court rules on any motion to dismiss filed by Defendants, or Dated: 11/13/2017 __________________________________ no less than thirty (30) days after Defendants file an answer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge Complaint (whichever is appropriate). 11 12 The parties shall serve Rule 26 initial disclosures no less than seven (7) days before any rescheduled Initial Case Management Conference. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 17 18 Dated: ___________________________________ Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Magistrate Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER 4 OSCAR LEATHERMAN v. CITY OF EUREKA et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-05610-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?