Leatherman v. City of Eureka et al
Filing
9
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 8 Stipulation to Extend Case Deadlines. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Peter E. Martin, SBN 121672
peter@martinmacklaw.com
Shelley K. Mack, SBN 209596
shelley@martinmacklaw.com
Martin & Mack LLP
1369 G Street
Arcata, California 95521
Tel: (707) 268-0445
Fax: (707) 667-0318
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OSCAR LEATHERMAN
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
OSCAR LEATHERMAN,
) CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05610-HSG
4
)
) STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE
Plaintiff,
) DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
)
vs.
)
)
)
CITY OF EUREKA, EUREKA POLICE
)
DEPARTMENT, and STEVE WATSON, in )
his official capacity as Interim Chief of Police, )
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________________ )
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
0
STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
OSCAR LEATHERMAN v. CITY OF EUREKA et al., Case No. 4
3:17-cv-05610-HSG
1
2
3
4
Plaintiff Oscar Leatherman ( “Plaintiff” or “Mr. Leatherman”) filed the above-referenced
action on or about September 28, 2017.
On September 29, 2017, this Court issued its Initial Case Management Scheduling Order
with ADR Deadlines, instructing the parties to file their Joint Initial Case Management
5
Conference Statement on or before December 26, 2017, and setting an initial case management
6
7
conference for 2:00 p.m. on January 2, 2018. Pursuant to the Court’s Order of September 29,
8
2017 and Rule 26(a)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties’ Rule 26 initial
9
disclosures are presently due to be served on or before December 26, 2017.
10
On September 29, 2017, by and through their attorney of record, Cyndy Day-Wilson,
11
12
Defendants City of Eureka, Eureka Police Department, and Steve Watson, in his official capacity
13
as Chief of Police (collectively hereinafter, “Defendants”), requested an extension of time to and
14
through November 7, 2017 in order to respond to Mr. Leatherman’s Complaint. Plaintiff’s
15
counsel of record, Shelley K. Mack, granted Defendants’ request for an extension of time the
16
same day.
17
18
Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the extension of time
19
granted on September 29, 2017, Defendants are currently due to file an answer or other
20
responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before November 7, 2017.
21
On November 2, 2017, Plaintiff, through his attorney of record, Shelley K. Mack,
22
notified Defendants, through their attorney of record, Eureka City Attorney Cyndy Day-Wilson,
23
24
that he wishes to file a First Amended Complaint.
Counsel for the parties conferred on
25
November 6, 2017, and in order to make the most efficient use of the parties’ resources and
26
avoid duplicative proceedings before this Court, agreed as follows:
27
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants
28
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
OSCAR LEATHERMAN v. CITY OF EUREKA et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-05610-HSG
4
1
respectively, through their attorneys of record, that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will be filed on or before December 7, 2017.
3
2. Defendants shall file their responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s First Amended
4
Complaint on or before January 12, 2018.
5
3. The parties agree that the Initial Case Management Conference in the above6
7
captioned action shall be held no less than thirty (30) days after the Court rules on any
8
motion to dismiss filed by Defendants, or no less than thirty (30) days after
9
Defendants file an answer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (whichever is
10
appropriate).
11
12
4. The parties further agree to serve Rule 26 initial disclosures no less than seven (7)
13
days before the Initial Case Management Conference, as rescheduled pursuant to this
14
Stipulation.
15
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
17
Respectfully Submitted,
18
19
20
Dated: November 8, 2017
By:
/s/ Shelley K. Mack
___________________________
Peter E. Martin
Shelley K. Mack
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OSCAR LEATHERMAN
Dated: November 8, 2017
By:
/s/ Cyndy Day-Wilson
__________________________________
Cyndy Day-Wilson, Eureka City Attorney
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF EUREKA, EUREKA POLICE
DEPARTMENT, and STEVE WATSON, in his
official capacity as interim Chief of Police
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
OSCAR LEATHERMAN v. CITY OF EUREKA et al., Case No. 4
3:17-cv-05610-HSG
ORDER
1
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint in this matter be
3
4
filed on or before December 7, 2017, and Defendants shall file their responsive pleading to
5
Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint on or before January 12, 2018.
6
7
8
9
10
The Initial Case Management Conference in the above-captioned action shall be held no
IT IS SO ORDERED.
less than thirty (30) days after the Court rules on any motion to dismiss filed by Defendants, or
Dated: 11/13/2017
__________________________________
no less than thirty (30) days after Defendants file an answer to Plaintiff’s First Amended
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge
Complaint (whichever is appropriate).
11
12
The parties shall serve Rule 26 initial disclosures no less than seven (7) days before any
rescheduled Initial Case Management Conference.
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
17
18
Dated:
___________________________________
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Magistrate Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
4
OSCAR LEATHERMAN v. CITY OF EUREKA et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-05610-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?