American Civil Liberties Union et al v. Wright et al
Filing
46
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 42 Administrative Motion for Relief From Referral to ADR Multi-Option Program. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2018)
1
7
ALEXIS COLL-VERY (SBN 212735)
acoll-very@stblaw.com
MARISSA LAMBERT (SBN 312567)
marissa.lambert@stblaw.com
P. CASEY MATHEWS (SBN 311838)
casey.mathews@stblaw.com
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304-1114
Telephone: (650) 251-5000
Facsimile:
(650) 251-5002
8
Pro Bono Attorneys for Plaintiffs
2
3
4
5
6
9
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
OAKLAND DIVISION
13
______________________________________
14
ACLU, et al.,
15
Plaintiffs,
16
v.
17
18
19
20
ERIC D. HARGAN, Acting Secretary of
Health and Human Services, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 4:17-cv-5772-HSG
STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING RELIEF FROM
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO ADR
MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM
21
22
23
24
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2017 this case was assigned to the Northern District of
California’s Multi-Option ADR Program (“ADR Program”);
25
WHEREAS, in connection with the assignment to that program, each of the parties and
26
their respective attorneys have read either the handbook entitled “Dispute Resolution Procedures in
27
the Northern District of California,” or the specified portions of the ADR Internet site,
28
1
JOINT REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM REFERRAL TO ADR PROGRAM
Case No.: 4:17-cv-5772-HSG
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
www.cand.uscourts.gov/adr, considered the available dispute resolution options provided by the
Court and private entities; and discussed whether this case might benefit from the available dispute
resolution options;
WHEREAS, the parties mutually agree that referral to a formal ADR process is unlikely to
be beneficial given the nature of the case;
WHEREAS, the parties mutually agree at this time that ADR is unlikely to aid in the
resolution of this case and may unnecessarily consume the Court’s time and resources;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned
counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendants, that:
1.
The parties jointly request that the case be removed from the ADR Multi-Option
Program and that they be excused from participating in the ADR phone conference and any further
formal ADR process.
2.
If any party subsequently determines that submission to the formal ADR process
would be beneficial to the efficient resolution of this matter, that party may request placement in
one of the Court’s ADR programs at that time.
16
17
Dated: January 4, 2018
Respectfully submitted,
18
___/s/ Alexis Coll-Very____________
ALEXIS COLL-VERY
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304-1114
Telephone: (650) 251-5000
Facsimile:
(650) 251-5002
Email:
acoll-very@stblaw.com
Pro Bono Attorneys for ACLU Plaintiffs
19
20
21
22
23
/s/ Melissa Goodman
MELISSA GOODMAN
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA
1313 West 8th Street
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 977-9500
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM REFERRAL TO ADR PROGRAM
Case No.: 4:17-cv-5772-HSG
1
Facsimile:
(213) 97
77-5299
Email:
mgoodm
man@acluso
ocal.org
Attorneys f Plaintiffs ACLU and SEIU-UHW
for
s
d
W
2
3
CHAD A. READLER
Acting Ass
sistant Attor
rney General
l
BRIAN ST
TRETCH
United Sta Attorney
ates
y
ETHAN P. DAVIS
Deputy As
ssistant Attor
rney Genera
al
JOEL McE
ELVAIN
Assistant B
Branch Direc
ctor
4
5
6
7
/s/ Justin M. Sandbe
n
erg
JUSTIN M. SAND
DBERG, IL Bar No
L
o.
6278377
al
Senior Tria Counsel
United Sta Departm of Justic
ates
ment
ce
Civil Divis
sion, Federal Programs B
l
Branch
20 Mass. A NW, Rm 7302
Ave.
m.
Washingto D.C. 200
on,
001
Telephone: (202) 514-5838
Facsimile:
(202) 616-8202
Email:
Justin.S
Sandberg@u
usdoj.gov
Counsel fo Federal D
or
Defendants
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ORDE
ER
19
20
21
22
23
urt,
c
he
Administrativ Motion fo Relief from Automatic
ve
or
m
c
The Cou having considered th parties’ A
Ref
ferral to the Multi-Option ADR Prog
M
n
gram hereby GRANTS t motion.
the
IT IS SO ORDERE this 8th day of Janau 2018.
O
ED,
d
ury,
24
25
_________
__________
___________
__________
HON. HAY
YWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED S
STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dat
ted: January 8, 2018
y
26
27
28
3
JOINT REQ
QUEST FOR RELIEF FROM REFERRAL TO ADR PRO
R
M
OGRAM
Ca No.: 4:17-c
ase
cv-5772-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?