State of California v. Health and Human Services et al

Filing 83

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 57 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Batchelder, Rhiannon. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2017)

Download PDF
Reset Form 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 The State of California, et al., 4 5 6 Plaintiff(s), v. Health and Human Services, et al., 7 Defendant(s). 8 9 10 11 12 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:17-cv-05783 Case No: _______________ APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3) I, Rhiannon N. Batchelder , an active member in good standing of the bar of the State of New York , hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the Northern District of California representing: see attached in the Anna Erickson White above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office within the State of California. MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD: 14 Morrison & Foerster LLP 250 West 55th St., New York, NY 10019 Morrison & Foerster LLP 425 Market St., San Francisco, CA 94105 15 (212) 468-8000 16 rbatchelder@mofo.com 17 I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: 5415088 . 18 A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said bar is attached to this application. 19 I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 13 MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: 20 21 LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: (415) 268-7000 LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: awhite@mofo.com I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: 12/04/17 Rhiannon N. Batchelder APPLICANT 22 23 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE 24 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of Rhiannon N. Batchelder is granted, subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. 28 Dated: 12/8/2017 25 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER October 2012 ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF RHIANNON N. BATCHELDER PRO HAC VICE (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3) I represent the following amici curiae: 1. The American Association of University Women; 2. The Service Employees International Union; 3. Girls Inc.; 4. If/When/How: Lawyering for Reproductive Justice; 5. California Women Lawyers; 6. Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois; 7. Women’s Bar Association of the State of New York; and 8. Women Lawyers on Guard Inc. ny-1306817 ~' ~usanna ~njas, C!Ilerk nf ±fr.e J\ppdlak ~ifrisinn nf ±fr.e ~upr.enre crruur± nf ±fr.e ~±a±.e nf ~.efu !nrk, JJfirs± Wuoirial ~.eparfnrenf, .c.erfify ±frat RHIANNON NICOLE BATCHELDER funs buly li.c.ens.eb anb aamifkb fn pradi.c.e as an J\ffnrn.ey ana crrnunsdlnr af 'lilafu in all ±fr.e .cnurfs nf ±fr.e ~fa±£ nf ~.efu 'Inr k nn JJf.ehrunru 8, 201.6, fras buly ±erk.en anb suhs.crih.eb ±fr.e na±fr nf nffi.c.e pr.es.crih.eb by lafu, fras h.e.en .enrnll.eb in ±fr.e ~nll nf J\f±nrn.eys anb crrnuns.ellnrs af 'lilafu nn fil.e in my nffi.c.e, fras buly r.egisf.er.eb fui±fr ±fr.e abminisfrafifr.e nffi.c.e nf ±fr.e .cnurfs, anb a.c.cnrbing fn ±fr.e r.e.cnrbs nf ±fris .cnurf is in gnnb sfanbing as an affnrn.ey anb .cnuns.ellnr af lafu_ ~n ~ifn.ess ~fr.er.en£,~ frafr.e fr.er.eunfn s.ef my franb anb affix.en ±fr.e s.eal nf ±fris .cnurf nn ~ofr:emh:er 3U, ZU17 7667 . I

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?