Flores v. Concord Police Officer Walker #0568, et al

Filing 36

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/12/2018. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2018)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ROSAMANDA FLORES,

v.

9
10
11

Case No. 17-cv-05810-PJH

Plaintiff,

8

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

CONCORD POLICE OFFICER
WALKER #0568, et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 35

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.
12
13
14

The court is in receipt of defendants’ letter brief stating, inter alia, that plaintiff has

15

failed to participate in discovery. Dkt. 35. Specifically, plaintiff’s counsel has failed to

16

respond to defendants’ multiple attempts to meet and confer, failed to provide Fed. R.

17

Civ. P. 26 Initial Disclosures, and failed to respond to propounded written discovery.

18

Dkt. 35.

19

The court hereby ORDERS plaintiff to show cause why sanctions, including

20

terminating sanctions, should not be imposed for the above listed failures. Plaintiff’s

21

counsel is ordered to file a written response to this order within 14 days.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 12, 2018
__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge