Pace Anti-Piracy, Inc. v. Inside Secure et al

Filing 63

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 62 Stipulation to File First Amended Complaint. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 John V. Picone III (State Bar No. 187226) jpicone@hopkinscarley.com Jennifer Coleman (State Bar No. 213210) jcoleman@hopkinscarley.com C. Gideon Korrell (State Bar No. 284890) gkorrell@hopkinscarley.com HOPKINS & CARLEY A Law Corporation The Letitia Building 70 South First Street San Jose, CA 95113-2406 mailing address: P.O. Box 1469 San Jose, CA 95109-1469 Telephone: (408) 286-9800 Facsimile: (408) 998-4790 Attorneys for Plaintiff PACE Anti-Piracy, Inc. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 OAKLAND DIVISION 15 PACE ANTI-PIRACY, INC., a California corporation, 16 CASE NO. 4:17-cv-05860-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 19 INSIDE SECURE S.A., a French legal entity, and INSIDE SECURE CORP., a Delaware corporation, 20 Defendants. 21 22 STIPULATION 23 Plaintiff PACE Anti-Piracy, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and defendants Inside Secure S.A. and 24 25 Inside Secure Corp. (“Defendants”) by, and through their respective counsel, jointly stipulate as 26 follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the instant action on October 12, 2017; 27 28 H OPKINS & C ARLEY ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN JOSE /// 870\2949732.2 STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 2 WHEREAS, on December 26, 2017, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss,, which is now fully briefed; 3 4 WHEREAS, on February 7, 2018, the Court issued an order (Dkt. 53) setting the deadline for amending pleadings and joining parties for April 9, 2018; 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiff intends to file a First Amended Complaint to assert two additional 6 causes of action of induced infringement and contributory infringement (Attached hereto as 7 Exhibit 1); 8 9 WHEREAS, FRCP Rule 15(a)(2) permits a party to amend its pleading with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave; 10 11 WHEREAS, Defendants do not oppose or object to the filing of the First Amended Complaint; 12 WHEREAS, the filing of the First Amended Complaint does not affect the issues raised 13 by Defendants’ pending motion, which, if granted, would result in dismissal of all causes of 14 action in the First Amended Complaint; 15 16 17 NOW IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants, through their undersigned counsel of record, that: 18 1. Plaintiff may file its First Amended Complaint; and 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// H OPKINS & C ARLEY ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN JOSE 870\2949732.2 -2STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 2. Defendants do not need to re-file their pending motion to dismiss or otherwise 2 respond to the First Amended Complaint prior to the resolution of that motion. 3 IT IS SO STIPULATED 4 5 Dated: April 10, 2018 6 HOPKINS & CARLEY A Law Corporation 7 By: /s/ John V. Picone III John V. Picone III Jennifer S. Coleman C. Gideon Korrell Attorneys for Plaintiff PACE Anti-Piracy, Inc. 8 9 10 11 Dated: April 10, 2018 12 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 13 By: /s/ James Y. Pak James Y. Pak Attorneys for Defendants Inside Secure and Inside Secure Corp. 14 15 16 ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 17 18 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that I have obtained the concurrence in 19 the filing of this document from all signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a 20 “conformed” signature (/ s /) within this electronically filed document and I have on file records 21 to support this concurrence for subsequent production to the Court if so ordered or for inspection 22 upon request. 23 Dated: April 10, 2018 24 25 By: /s/ John Picone John V. Picone III Attorney for Plaintiff PACE Anti-Piracy, Inc. 26 27 28 H OPKINS & C ARLEY ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN JOSE 870\2949732.2 -3STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 2 ORD DER Pursua to FRCP Rule 15, the Court’s Feb ant e bruary 7, 20 schedulin order, stip 018 ng pulation of 3 the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, th Plaintiff is hereby gra e he anted leave to file its 4 First Amended Complaint d t. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERE S ED. 7 8 Dated: April 10, 2018 2 __ __________ ___________ _________ H HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM JR. M, U United States District Jud dge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 H OPKINS & C ARLEY ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN JOSE 870 0\2949732.2 -4ST TIPULATION AND ORDER R

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?