Pallagrosi v. The Gap, Inc. et al

Filing 19

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 18 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2018)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT " NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA" MICHAEL PALLAGROSI, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Case No. 4:17-cv-05905-HSG Plaintiff(s) v. THE GAP, INC.; GAP (APPAREL) LLC; GAP INTERNATIONAL SALES, INC.; BANANA REPUBLIC, LLC; and BANANA REPUBLIC (APPAREL) LLC, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: " 0 " Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) " 0 " Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 0 " Private ADR (specify process and provider) X Private Mediation through JAMS with Judge Infante conducting the mediation. Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5." The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: " 0 " the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) " " other requested deadline: six months from the date of the order referring the case to ADR. " 0 X Date: January 10, 2018 Date: January 10, 2018 Todd M. Friedman Attorney for Plaintiff" Joseph Duffy Attorney for Defendant" " X " IT IS SO ORDERED " IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: 1/11/2018 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE" Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?