Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fossil Group, Inc. et al

Filing 87

JUDGMENT INVALIDATING ASSERTED PATENT CLAIMS. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/10/18. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2018)

1
2
3
4
5

Dalia B. Kothari (SBN 299867)
[e-mail]
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
Redwood, CA 94063
Tel. [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
FOSSIL GROUP, INC. AND MISFIT INC.

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

OAKLAND DIVISION

11
12

CELLSPIN SOFT, INC.,

13
14

v.

[PROPOSED ORDER OF] JUDGMENT
INVALIDATING ASSERTED PATENT
CLAIMS

15

FOSSIL GROUP, INC. and MISFIT INC.,

Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

16

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 17-cv-05933-YGR

Defendant.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED ORDER OF] JUDGMENT
17-CV-05933-YGR

1

This action having come before the Court, and pursuant to the Court’s Order (Dkt. No. 85)

2

granting Defendants Fossil Group, Inc. and Misfit Inc.’s (collectively, “Fossil”) Motion to

3

Dismiss (Dkt. No. 52) finding all asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,738,794 (the “’794

4

Patent”), 8,892,752 (the “’752 Patent”), and 9,749,847 (the “’847 Patent”) directed to patent-

5

ineligible subject matter and therefore invalid pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101—IT IS HEREBY

6

ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that:

7

For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order on April 3, 2018 (Dkt. No. 85), claims 1–4,

8

7, 9, 16–18, and 20–21 from the ’794 Patent, claims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 12–14 from the ’752 Patent,

9

and claims 1-3 from the ’847 Patent are invalid pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101.

10
11
12
13

The foregoing claims of the ’794, ’752, and ’847 Patents represent all pending claims at
issue in this case.
WHEREFORE JUDGMENT is entered in this case in favor of Defendant Fossil and
against Plaintiff Cellspin Soft, Inc.

14
15
16

April 10. 2018
Dated: _____________________, 2018
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Court Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-

[PROPOSED ORDER OF] JUDGMENT
17-CV-05933-YGR