Brennan v. General Woodcraft, Inc.

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 23 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER of Dismissal filed by Charles Brennan.***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 6/14/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2018)

1 Daniel S. Raff (SBN 279259)
Edwin Bradley, Of Counsel (SBN 141932)
2 RAFF LAW, APC
The Grace Building
3 17 Keller Street
Petaluma, CA 94954
707-879-8040
4 Telephone:
Fax:
707-674-5600
5 Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
7 CHARLES BRENNAN
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
Case No.: 4:17-cv-06061-KAW

12 CHARLES BRENNAN,
Plaintiffs,

13
14

vs.

15 GENERAL WOODCRAFT INC., and DOES 150, inclusive,
16
Defendants.
17

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(A)(1)(A)(ii)
and ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Complaint Filed: Sept. 15, 2017
Case Before:
The Hon. Kandis Westmore

18
19
20
21
22
23

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties and/or their
respective counsel, and in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, that this
action be dismissed with prejudice as to all claims, causes of action, and parties pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

24
25
26
27

Dated: June 7, 2018

RAFF LAW, APC
/s/ Daniel S. Raff____________________
Daniel S. Raff
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Charles Brennan

28
1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

1 Dated: June 6, 2018

JACKSON LEWIS P.C.

2
/s/ Spencer J. Davidson_______________
Denise Trani-Morris
Spencer J. Davidson
Attorneys for Defendant,
General Woodcraft Inc.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

ORDER

10
11
12

The stipulation is approved. The entire action, including all claims and counterclaims stated
herein against all parties, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

6/14
Dated: _______________, 2018

____________________
Kandis A. Westmore
U.S. Magistrate Judge
U.S. District Court

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL