Davis v. City of San Francisco

Filing 7

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Show Cause Response due by 1/19/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on January 10, 2018. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/10/2018: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (igS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JIMMY LEE DAVIS,

Case No. 17-cv-06387-DMR

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
Defendant.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
Re: Dkt. No. 6

12

On November 1, 2017, Plaintiff Jimmy Lee Davis filed suit in this Court along with an

13

application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). [Docket Nos. 1, 2]. On December 15, 2017, the

14

court granted the IFP application and dismissed the Complaint with leave to amend. [Docket No.

15

6]. Mr. Davis was ordered to file an amended complaint by January 4, 2018. Id. No amended

16

complaint has been filed.

17

Accordingly, the court ORDERS Mr. Davis to respond by January 19, 2018 and explain

18

in writing (1) why he failed to file an amended complaint and (2) why the case should not be

19

dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to respond by January 19, 2018 may result in dismissal

20

of this action.

28

R NIA

onn
Judge D

ER

H

27

RT

26

______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrateyu
a M. R Judge

NO

25

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

FO

24

Dated: January 10, 2018

LI

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

A

22

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

21

UNIT
ED

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C