Davis v. City of San Francisco
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Show Cause Response due by 1/19/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on January 10, 2018. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/10/2018: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (igS, COURT STAFF).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JIMMY LEE DAVIS,
Case No. 17-cv-06387-DMR
CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
Re: Dkt. No. 6
On November 1, 2017, Plaintiff Jimmy Lee Davis filed suit in this Court along with an
application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). [Docket Nos. 1, 2]. On December 15, 2017, the
court granted the IFP application and dismissed the Complaint with leave to amend. [Docket No.
6]. Mr. Davis was ordered to file an amended complaint by January 4, 2018. Id. No amended
complaint has been filed.
Accordingly, the court ORDERS Mr. Davis to respond by January 19, 2018 and explain
in writing (1) why he failed to file an amended complaint and (2) why the case should not be
dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to respond by January 19, 2018 may result in dismissal
of this action.
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrateyu
a M. R Judge
IT IS S
Dated: January 10, 2018
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
D IS T IC T O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?