California Security Alarms, Inc. v. Martell

Filing 37

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. ON PARTIES 36 PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULE: Amended Pleadings due by 5/4/2018; Close of Fact Discovery due by 9/14/2018; Opening Reports due by 9/14/2018; Rebuttal Reports due by 10/19/ 2018; Close of Expert Discovery due by 11/16/2018; Motion Hearing set for 12/13/2018 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S.Gilliam Jr.; Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/12/2019 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. Jury Selection/Jury Trial (5-day) set for 3/11/2019 08:30 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2018)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8

CALIFORNIA SECURITY ALARMS,
INC.,
Plaintiff,

9
v.

ORDER ON PARTIES’ PROPOSED
DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULE
Re: Dkt. No. 36

10
11

Case No. 17-cv-06388-HSG

MATTHEW MATHIAS MARTELL,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendant.
12
A case management conference was held on February 6, 2018. On February 22, 2018, the

13
14

parties submitted a stipulation with a proposed discovery plan. See Dkt. No. 36. The Court

15

GRANTS the parties’ proposals regarding the performance of oral and written discovery. See id.

16

at 2. The Court sets the following case deadlines pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, Federal Rule

17

of Civil Procedure 16, and Civil Local Rule 16-10.
Litigation Event

18

Date

Amendment of Pleadings Deadline

May 4, 2018

Mediation Deadline

May 7, 2018

Close of Fact Discovery

September 14, 2018

Exchange Opening Expert Reports

September 14, 2018

Exchange Rebuttal Expert Reports

October 19, 2018

Close of Expert Discovery

November 16, 2018

Dispositive Motion Hearing Deadline

December 13, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.

Pretrial Conference

February 12, 2019 at 3:00 p.m.

Jury Trial

March 11, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. (5 days)

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

//

1

These dates may only be altered by order of the Court and only upon a showing of good cause.

2

The parties are directed to review and comply with the Court’s Civil Pretrial and Trial

3

Standing Order.

4
5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 2/28/2018
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2