Johnson v. Berryhill

Filing 17

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 16 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand filed by Kerri Johnson, Nancy A. Berryhill. Motions due by 4/3/2018. Replies due by 5/15/2018. Responses due by 5/1/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/22/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Nancy K. McCombs, CSBN 163629 12 Geary Street, Suite #201 San Francisco, California 94108 Telephone: (415) 678-2626 Email: abelmccombs@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiff Kerri Johnson 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 KERRI JOHNSON, ) ) ) v. ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) ) Defendant ) ) Plaintiff, Case No. 4:17-cv-06433-KAW STIPULATED REQUEST EXTENDING TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR REMAND AND PROPOSED ORDER. (Plaintiff’s First Extension Request) 15 16 The parties request that Plaintiff shall have an additional 14 days, to and including 17 April 3, 2018, in which to move for summary judgment. This is a change from the original 18 date of March 20, 2018. 19 (2) Plaintiff seeks additional time because Attorney Nancy McCombs has a heavy 20 caseload. This is Plaintiff’s first extension request. Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s Motion for 21 22 Summary Judgment will be due on May 1, 2018. Plaintiff’s Reply brief, if necessary, will be 23 due on May 15, 2018. 24 //// 25 //// -1- 1 2 DATED: 3/19/2018 _____ By: /s/ Nancy K. McCombs NANCY K. MCCOMBS, Attorney for Plaintiff 3 4 5 DATED: 3/19/2018 _ By: /s/ Jeffrey Chen JEFFREY CHEN, Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED: 9 10 11 3/22/18 DATED:______________ By: ______________________________ HONORABLE KANDIS A. WESTOMORE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?