Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Loza
Filing
75
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 73 Stipulation selecting Early Neutral Evaluation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2020)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS
HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND
FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, et al.
CASE No C 17-06474-HSG
Plaintiff(s)
v.
STIPULATION AND ORDER
JUAN MANUEL LOZA, an individual doing
SELECTING ADR PROCESS
business as LOZA & SONS CONSTRUCTION
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge (ADR L.R. 7)
Private ADR (specify process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR)
other requested deadline:
Date: March 10, 2020
Date: March 10, 2020
/s/ Ronald L. Richman
Attorney for Plaintiffs
RONALD L. RICHMAN
/s/ Paul V. Simpson
Attorney for Defendant
PAUL V. SIMPSON
X IT IS SO ORDERED.
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS:
DATE:
3/13/2020
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order
Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Early
Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.”
{32673-1 00501248.DOCX 1 }Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-15-2019
4818-9512-8503.1 29512/00267
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.FormsWorkFlow.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?