Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Loza

Filing 75

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 73 Stipulation selecting Early Neutral Evaluation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2020)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, et al. CASE No C 17-06474-HSG Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND ORDER JUAN MANUEL LOZA, an individual doing SELECTING ADR PROCESS business as LOZA & SONS CONSTRUCTION Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge (ADR L.R. 7) Private ADR (specify process and provider) The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR) other requested deadline: Date: March 10, 2020 Date: March 10, 2020 /s/ Ronald L. Richman Attorney for Plaintiffs RONALD L. RICHMAN /s/ Paul V. Simpson Attorney for Defendant PAUL V. SIMPSON X IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS SO ORDERED WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS: DATE: 3/13/2020 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” {32673-1 00501248.DOCX 1 }Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-15-2019 4818-9512-8503.1 29512/00267 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?