Jeffries v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 10 . STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Martha Jeffries. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 1/24/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2018)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Martha Jeffries CASE No 4: 1 7-ev-065 12-KAW Plaintiffs) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS The Home Depot USA, Inc. Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R 5) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an Mediation (ADR L.R 6) early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice ofNeedfor Private ADR (specify process and provider) ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this MEDIATION MEDIATION form. See Civil Local Rule 1 6-8 and ADR L.R. 3-6. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 24 the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date ofthe order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) other requested deadline: <£2 m, 2018 Date: Januai Martha Jeffries Attorney for Plaintiff Date: January^ , 20 18 Home (Ld& VhAtWiciuA bepot USA, Inc. Attorney for Defendant x IT IS SO ORDERED IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: 1/24/18 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation " or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE " or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR. " Form ADRStip rev. 1-201 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?