Arevalo v. Hennessy
Filing
5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Habeas Answer by 12/14/2017. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 11/30/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ERICK AREVALO,
Petitioner,
8
VICKI HENNESSY,
Respondent.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
9
10
Case No.17-cv-06676-HSG
12
Petitioner Erick Arevalo, who is in the custody of the San Francisco Sheriff pending trial,
13
14
has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Dkt. No. 1. The Court has
15
reviewed the petition and supporting documents and finds that, liberally construed, Petitioner’s
16
claims appear colorable under section 2241 and merit an answer from Respondent Vicki
17
Hennessy.
18
For the foregoing reasons and for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS:
19
1. Petitioner is directed to serve Respondent and the California Attorney General’s Office
with this order and the petition within one day of the date of this order.
20
21
2. Within one day of the date of this order, Petitioner is also directed to serve a courtesy
22
copy of this order and the petition by email on Katie Stowe of the California Attorney
23
General’s Office.
24
3. Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner, within 14 days of the date
25
of this order, an answer showing why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued.
26
Respondent should include a copy of all excerpts of the administrative record that are
27
relevant to a determination of the issues in the petition.
28
//
1
2
3
4
4. If Petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a traverse with the
Court and serving it on Respondent within 4 days of his receipt of the answer.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 11/30/2017
5
6
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?