Treviller v. Goldstein et al

Filing 21

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE;, ORDER REOPENING CASE; COURT GRANTS PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERRATION. Amended Complaint filed no later than 10/15/18. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 9/17/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 E. D. TREVILLER, Plaintiff, 7 8 9 10 CASE NO. 17-cv-06787-YGR vs. FOLEY, ET AL., Defendants. ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Re: Dkt. No. 17 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 The Court has received plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of order dismissing case for 13 failure to prosecute. (Dkt. No. 17.) Plaintiff’s motion appears to refer to an order the Court issued 14 in related case, Treviller v. Goldstein, et al, Case No. 4:17-cv-06684-YGR at Docket Number 19, 15 dismissing case for failure to prosecute. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court SHALL FILE the 16 motion in the related case, Treviller v. Goldstein, et al. 17 Moreover, the Court has reviewed plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration and hereby 18 GRANTS plaintiff’s motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court SHALL 19 reopen the case Treviller v. Goldstein, et al, Case No. 4:17-cv-06684-YGR. Plaintiff SHALL FILE, 20 in Case No. 4:17-cv-06684-YGR, his amended complaint no later than Monday, October 15, 21 2018. (See Dkt. No. 14.) Plaintiff is directed to review the Court’s May 18, 2018 Order (Dkt. No. 22 12) as well as the Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Jacqueline S. Corley (Dkt. 23 No. 10) for further explanation of the deficiencies he must correct in his amended complaint. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 17, 2018 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?