v. Chevron Products Co.

Filing 58

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 07/16/2018. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2018)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

DONALD POTTER, et al.,

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 17-cv-06689-PJH

Plaintiffs,

8
v.

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFFS’
MEMORANDUM OF LAW

CHEVRON PRODUCTS CO.,

Re: Dkt. No. 57

Defendant.

12
13
14

On March 2, 2018, defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ first amended

15

complaint. Dkt. 27. Plaintiffs filed an opposition to that motion, and defendant filed a

16

reply. Dkts. 40–41. At that point, neither party was permitted to file additional

17

memoranda without the court’s prior approval, with limited exceptions. Civ. L.R. 7-3(d).

18

On June 22, 2018, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a supplemental

19

memorandum regarding defendant’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. 51. The court denied

20

plaintiffs’ motion. Dkt. 56. Plaintiffs subsequently filed a memorandum regarding

21

defendant’s motion to dismiss in contravention of the court’s order. Dkt. 57.

22

Plaintiffs’ memorandum of law filed at Docket Number 57 is hereby STRICKEN

23

from the docket, given that it was prohibited by the Northern District of California’s local

24

rules. Civ. L.R. 7-3(d); see Leong v. Potter, 347 F.3d 1117, 1125 (9th Cir. 2003).

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 16, 2018
__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge