King v. United States of America

Filing 15

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on January 8, 2018. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/8/2018: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (igS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 LEBARON KING, Case No. 17-cv-06709-DMR Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Re: Dkt. No. 14 12 On October 17, 2017, Plaintiff LeBaron King (“Mr. King”) filed a Claim and Order to Go 13 14 to Small Claims Court in San Francisco Superior Court, against Defendant Stephanie Lee, an 15 employee of the United States Mint, alleging that Ms. Lee had made false statements about him to 16 his co-workers. See Ex. A to Not. of Removal [Docket No. 1-2]. Defendant United States of 17 America (“Defendant”), substituted as Defendant for Ms. Lee, removed the action to this court on 18 November 21, 2017. See Not. of Removal [Docket No. 1]. On November 28, 2017, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss. [Docket No. 8]. Pursuant 19 20 to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Mr. King was required to file an opposition brief by December 12, 21 2017. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). No opposition was filed. Accordingly, on December 20, 2017, the court issued an Order to Show Cause, instructing 22 23 Mr. King to submit a written statement by no later than January 2, 2018 explaining his failure to 24 respond to the motion. [Docket No. 14.] The Order to Show Cause stated that failure to respond 25 by January 2, 2018 may result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. 26 // 27 // 28 // dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 6 DERED O OR IT IS S ______________________________________ Donna M. Ryu United States Magistrate u . Ry Judge aM NO 7 Dated: January 8, 2018 RT 8 onn Judge D ER 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 A H 9 R NIA 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 4 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 3 FO 2 Mr. King did not respond to the Order to Show Cause. Accordingly, this matter is hereby LI 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?