Gonzales v. Berryhill

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED re 15 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND filed by Nancy Berryhill, Joanna Gonzales. Motions due by 7/5/2018. Responses due by 8/6/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/29/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2018)

Download PDF
1 HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488) 2 3 5 1055 Lincoln Avenue San Jose, California 95125-6011 Telephone: (408) 295-7755 Facsimile: (408) 295-7444 6 /as 7 Attorney for Plaintiff 4 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOANNA GONZALES XXX-XX-5607 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. 15 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 16 17 Defendant 18 ) Case No. 4:17-cv-06855 ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ) AS MODIFIED ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 19 Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that 20 Plaintiff shall have a thirty (30) day extension of time until July 5, 2018, in which to e-file his 21 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motion, on 22 or before August 4, 2018. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff’s counsel’s upcoming 23 schedule of administrative hearings and district court briefs due. Plaintiff makes this request in 24 good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Defendant has no objection and 25 has stipulated to the requested relief. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 6 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 Dated: May 25, 2018 /s/HARVEY P. SACKETT HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff JOANNA GONZALES Dated: May 25, 2018 /s/DANIEL P. TALBERT______ DANIEL P. TALBERT Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: 5/29/18 12 ____ HON. KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?