Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. JK Imaging Ltd.

Filing 76

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/10/18. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Irfan A. Lateef (State Bar No. 204,004) irfan.lateef@knobbe.com Daniel C. Kiang (State Bar No. 307,961) daniel.kiang@knobbe.com KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP 2040 Main Street, 14th Floor Irvine, CA 92614 Telephone: 949-760-0404 Facsimile: 949-760-9502 Attorneys for Defendant JK IMAGING LTD. 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 OAKLAND DIVISION 13 14 Civil Action No. 4:17-cv-06881 (YGR) CELLSPIN SOFT, INC., [PROPOSED ORDER OF] JUDGMENT Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 v. Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers Courtroom: 1, 4th Floor JK IMAGING LTD., Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:17-cv-06881 YGR [Proposed Order of] Judgment 1 This action having come before the Court, and pursuant to the Court’s Order (Dkt. 2 No. 74) granting the Omnibus Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 24, 43) finding all 3 asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,258,698 (“the ’698 Patent”) directed to patent-ineligible 4 subject matter and therefore invalid pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101 – IT IS HEREBY 5 ADJUDGED AND ORDERED THAT: 6 7 For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order on April 3, 2018 (Dkt. No. 74), claims 1, 3–5, 7–8, 10–13, and 15–20 of the ’698 Patent are invalid pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101. 8 9 The foregoing claims of the ’698 Patent represent all asserted claims of the ’698 Patent, and therefore all pending claims at issue in this case. 10 11 WHEREFORE JUDGMENT is entered in this case in favor of Defendant JK Imaging Ltd. and against Plaintiff Cellspin Soft, Inc. 12 13 Dated: _____________________, 2018 April 10 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS United States District Court Judge 14 15 16 17 27995984 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- Case No. 4:17-cv-06881 YGR [Proposed Order of] Judgment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?