Hampton v. Aqua Metals, Inc. et al
Filing
121
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 120 JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION RELIEF TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND EXCEED PAGE LIMITS FOR THEIR MOTIONS TO DISMISS.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Michael R. Hogue (SBN 272083)
hoguem@gtlaw.com
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 655-1300
Facsimile: (415) 707-2010
Nicole Lavallee (SBN 165755)
nlavallee@bermantabacco.com
Kristin J. Moody (SBN 206326)
kmoody@bermantabacco.com
A. Chowning Poppler (SBN 272870)
cpoppler@bermantabacco.com
BERMAN TABACCO
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 433-3200
Robert Horowitz
horowitzr@gtlaw.com
MetLife Building
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Telephone: (212) 801-9200
Facsimile: (212) 801-6400
(pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Defendants
Aqua Metals, Inc.,
Thomas Murphy, and
Selwyn Mould
Counsel for the PLYMOUTH COUNTY
GROUP and Co-Lead Counsel for the
Class
[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]
Steven M. Schatz, State Bar No. 118356
Boris Feldman, State Bar No. 128838
Dylan G. Savage, State Bar No. 310452
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 565-5100
Email: sschatz@wsgr.com
boris.feldman@wsgr.com
dsavage@wsgr.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Stephen R. Clarke
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
In Re Aqua Metals, Inc. Securities Litigation
Lead Case No. 4:17-CV-07142-HSG
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SET
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND EXCEED
PAGE LIMITS RE MOTION TO
DISMISS AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
COMPLAINT
Case No. 4:17-CV-07142-HSG
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS RE BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
1
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2019, Plaintiffs filed their Amended Consolidated
2
Complaint for Violation of Securities Laws (“Amended Complaint”) [Doc. 119]. The Amended
3
Complaint, excluding exhibits, is 205 pages long and contained 550 paragraphs of allegations.
4
Id.
5
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2019, counsel for Defendants contacted counsel for
6
Plaintiffs to discuss a stipulation as to briefing schedule as to Defendants’ anticipated motions to
7
dismiss the Amended Complaint (“Motions”) as well as setting appropriate page limits for
8
briefing given the size and nature of the Amended Complaint and the fact that Defendant
9
Stephen R. Clarke had separate counsel from the other Defendants.
10
WHEREAS, pursuant to those discussions, the parties agreed that the Defendants would
11
have until November 22, 2019 to file their Motions, that Plaintiffs would have until January 31,
12
2020 to file their response to the Motions, and that Defendants would have until March 2, 2020
13
to file their reply briefs.
14
15
WHEREAS, the parties also agreed to a proposed hearing date of March 12, 2020, or as
soon thereafter as is convenient to the Court and to the parties.
16
WHEREAS, the parties agreed that Defendants’ motion papers would be no more than 50
17
pages combined for their respective briefs in support of the respective Motions, to be split
18
between Defendants as they deem appropriate, that Plaintiffs would be similarly permitted 50
19
pages for their brief in response, and that Defendants would be permitted 20 pages combined for
20
their reply briefing.
21
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the undersigned, that:
22
1. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the deadline for Defendants to file their Motions is
23
24
25
26
27
28
continued to November 22, 2019.
2. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their responses to
Defendants’ anticipated Motions is continued to January 31, 2020.
3. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the deadline for Defendants to file their replies in support
of their anticipated Motions is continued to March 2, 2020.
4. The Court shall set a hearing date of March 12, 2020, or as soon thereafter as is
Case No. 4:17-CV-07142-HSG
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS RE BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
1
convenient to the Court and to the parties.
2
5. The page limit imposed by Local Rule 7-4(b) with respect to Defendants’ anticipated
3
Motions is extended to fifty (50) total pages, to be divided between Defendants as
4
they deem appropriate.
5
6
6. The page limit imposed by Local Rule 7-4(b) with respect to Plaintiffs’ response to
Defendants’ anticipated Motions is extended to fifty (50) pages.
7
7. The page limit imposed by Local Rule 7-4(b) with respect to Defendants’ anticipated
8
reply briefs in support of their Motions is extended to twenty (20) total pages, to be
9
divided between Defendants as they deem appropriate.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:17-CV-07142-HSG
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS RE BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
BERMAN TABACCO
DATED: October 7, 2019
By:
/s/ Nicole Lavalee
Nicole Lavallee
Kristin J. Moody
A. Chowning Poppler
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 433-3200
Facsimile: (415) 433-6382
Email: nlavallee@bermantabacco.com
kmoody@bermantabacco.com
cpoppler@bermantabacco.com
Leslie R. Stern
BERMAN TABACCO
One Liberty Square
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: (617) 542-8300
Facsimile: (617) 542-1194
Email: lstern@bermantabacco.com
Shannon L. Hopkins
Nancy A. Kulesa
Stephanie A. Bartone
LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP
1111 Summer Street, Suite 403
Stamford, CT 06901
Telephone: (203) 992-4523
Facsimile: (212) 363-7171
Email: shopkins@zlk.com
nkulesas@zlk.com
sbartone@zlk.com
Rosemary M. Rivas
LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 291-2420
Facsimile: (415) 484-1294
Email: rrivas@zlk.com
Counsel for the Plymouth County Group and
Co-Lead Counsel for the Class
Case No. 4:17-CV-07142-HSG
4
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS RE BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
1
DATED: October 7, 2019
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
2
3
By:
4
Michael R. Hogue
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 655-1300
Facsimile: (415) 707-2010
Email: davidsonds@gtlaw.com
hoguem@gtlaw.com
5
6
7
8
/s/ Michael R. Hogue
Robert Horowitz
MetLife Building
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Telephone: (212) 801-9200
Facsimile: (212) 801-6400
Email: horowitzr@gtlaw.com
(pro hac vice)
9
10
11
12
13
Counsel for Defendants Aqua Metals, Inc.,
Thomas Murphy, and Selwyn Mould
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
DATED: October 7, 2019
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
By:
/s/ Steven M. Schatz
Steven M. Schatz
Steven M. Schatz, State Bar No. 118356
Boris Feldman, State Bar No. 128838
Dylan G. Savage, State Bar No. 310452
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 565-5100
Email: sschatz@wsgr.com
boris.feldman@wsgr.com
dsavage@wsgr.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Stephen R. Clarke
27
28
Case No. 4:17-CV-07142-HSG
5
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS RE BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
1
2
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all other signatories to this document
have concurred in its filing.
By: _/s/ Michael R. Hogue___________
3
4
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
13
ER
R NIA
S. Gillia
m Jr.
FO
Ju
y wo o d
d ge H a
H
12
RT
11
NO
10
LI
9
_____________________________
Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
D
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
DENIE
COURT JUDGE
UNIT
ED
8
DATED: October 8, 2019
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
7
S
6
A
5
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:17-CV-07142-HSG
6
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS RE BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?