Hampton v. Aqua Metals, Inc. et al

Filing 92

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 90 Administrative Motion to Exceed Page Limits for Motion to Dismiss and 91 Stipulation Re 90 Administrative Motion to Exceed Page Limits for Motion to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Nicole Lavallee (SBN 165755)
[e-mail]
Kristin J. Moody (SBN 206326)
[e-mail]
A. Chowning Poppler (SBN 272870)
[e-mail]
BERMAN TABACCO
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]

Donald S. Davidson (SBN 231908)
[e-mail]
Michael R. Hogue (SBN 272083)
[e-mail]
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Robert Horowitz
[e-mail]
MetLife Building
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
(pro hac vice)

Counsel for the PLYMOUTH COUNTY
GROUP and Co-Lead Counsel for the
Class
[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]

Attorneys for Defendants
AQUA METALS, INC.,
THOMAS MURPHY,
SELWYN MOULD, and
STEPHEN R. CLARKE

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

OAKLAND DIVISION

19
20
21
22
23

In Re Aqua Metals, Inc. Securities Litigation

Lead Case No. 4:17-CV-07142-HSG
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:17-CV-07142-HSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS

1

WHEREAS, on June 6, 2018, the Court approved the proposed scheduling order of the

2

parties and entered a scheduling order (“Scheduling Order”) setting a briefing schedule on

3

Defendants anticipated Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 68].

4

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated

5

Complaint for Violation of Securities Laws (“Complaint”) on July 20, 2018 [Doc. 83]. The

6

Complaint, excluding exhibits, was 130 pages long and contained 437 paragraphs of allegations.

7

Id.

8

WHEREAS, on September 10, 2018 counsel for Defendants contacted counsel for

9

Plaintiffs requesting Plaintiffs stipulate to oversized briefs given the size and nature of Plaintiffs’

10

Complaint. Pursuant to those discussions, the parties agreed that Defendants would file one

11

combined brief on behalf of all Defendants and be permitted 40 pages for their brief in support of

12

the anticipated Motion to Dismiss and that Plaintiffs would be similarly permitted 40 pages for

13

their brief in response.

14

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the undersigned, that:

15

1. The page limit imposed by Local Rule 7-4(b) with respect to Defendants’ anticipated

16

Motion to Dismiss, which will be one combined brief for all Defendants, is extended

17

to forty (40) pages.
2. The page limit imposed by Local Rule 7-4(b) with respect to Plaintiffs’ response to

18

Defendants’ anticipated Motion to Dismiss is extended to forty (40) pages.

19
20
21

///

22

///

23

///

24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 4:17-CV-07142-HSG
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2

DATED: September 14, 2018

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

BERMAN TABACCO
By:

/s/ Nicole Lavallee
Nicole Lavallee

Kristin J. Moody
A. Chowning Poppler
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Leslie R. Stern
BERMAN TABACCO
One Liberty Square
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Shannon L. Hopkins
Nancy A. Kulesa
Stephanie A. Bartone
LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP
733 Summer Street, Suite 304
Stamford, CT 06901
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Rosemary M. Rivas
LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Counsel for the Plymouth County Group and
Co-Lead Counsel for the Class
Case No. 4:17-CV-07142-HSG
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS

1

DATED: September 14, 2018

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

2
3

By:

4

Donald S. Davidson
Michael R. Hogue
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9

/s/ Michael R. Hogue

Robert Horowitz
MetLife Building
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
(pro hac vice)

10
11
12
13
14

Counsel for Defendants AQUA METALS, INC.,
THOMAS MURPHY, SELWYN MOULD, and
STEPHEN R. CLARKE

15
16
17
18
19

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all other signatories to this document
have concurred in its filing.
By: _/s/ Michael R. Hogue___________

20
21
22

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

23
24
25
26

DATED: September ____, 2018
17

_____________________________
Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT JUDGE

27
28

Case No. 4:17-CV-07142-HSG
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS