Ipsilium LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Filing 50

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 49 Stipulation to Extend ADR Deadlines. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Daniel Johnson Jr. (No. 57409) Mario Moore (No. 231644) Robert G. Litts (No. 205984) DAN JOHNSON LAW GROUP, LLP 400 Oyster Point Blvd., Suite 321 South San Francisco, CA 94080 Telephone: (415) 604-4500 dan@danjohnsonlawgroup.com mario@danjohnsonlawgroup.com robert@danjohnsonlawgroup.com 6 7 8 Sean P. DeBruine (No. 168071) 1259 El Camino Real, Suite 406 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 269-9140 sean@debruinelaw.com 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiff IPSILIUM LLC Sarah E. Piepmeier (SBN 227094) Sarah A. Piazza (SBN 293626) Elise S. Edlin (SBN 293756) Andrew T. Ohlert (SBN 306443) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 439-1400 Facsimile: (415) 439-1500 sarah.piepmeier@kirkland.com sarah.piazza@kirkland.com elise.edlin@kirkland.com andrew.ohlert@kirkland.com Attorneys for Defendant CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 OAKLAND DIVISION 22 23 IPSILIUM LLC, Plaintiff, 24 25 26 27 Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG (DMR) v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Defendant. 28 Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Mediation Deadline Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG (DMR) 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Ipsilium LLC (“Ipsilium”) and 2 Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) (collectively, “the Parties”) hereby jointly stipulate and 3 agree as follows, subject to the approval of the Court, to extend the deadline to complete mediation: 4 WHEREAS, under the June 29, 2018 Joint Stipulation and Order to Extend Deadlines (Dkt. 5 No. 46) the deadline for the parties to complete mediation was extended one week, from August 31, 6 2018 to the current deadline of September 7, 2018; and 7 WHEREAS, Cisco served its Response Damages Contentions on August 22, 2018, the 8 parties recently made their claim construction disclosures under Pat. L.R. 4-3, and they will file a 9 Joint Claim Construction Statement on August 30, 2018; and 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 WHEREAS, the parties and the court-appointed mediator, Vicki Veenker, have scheduling conflicts between August 30 and September 7, 2018; and WHEREAS, the parties believe that the mediation process would be more effective if they have additional time to consider each other’s claim construction and damages positions; and WHEREAS, the parties have discussed the requested extension with Ms. Veenker, who supports this stipulation; and WHEREAS, the parties and Ms. Veenker have agreed to hold a mediation session on October 10, 2018; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request the Court to Order that the 19 deadline for completion of mediation be extended from September 7, 2018 to October 12, 2018. No 20 other deadlines will be affected by this change. 21 22 DATED: August 28, 2018 By /s/ Sean P. DeBruine Sean P. DeBruine (No. 168071) 23 Attorney for Plaintiff IPSILIUM, LLC 24 25 By /s/ Sarah E. Piepmeier Sarah E. Piepmeier (No. 227094) 26 Attorney for Defendant CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 27 28 1 Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Mediation Deadline Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG (DMR) 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 DATED: _________ 8/30/2018 4 _____________________________________ Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories. 10 11 DATED: August 28, 2018 /s/ Sean P. DeBruine Sean P. DeBruine 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Mediation Deadline Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG (DMR)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?