Ipsilium LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Filing
50
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 49 Stipulation to Extend ADR Deadlines. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
Daniel Johnson Jr. (No. 57409)
Mario Moore (No. 231644)
Robert G. Litts (No. 205984)
DAN JOHNSON LAW GROUP, LLP
400 Oyster Point Blvd., Suite 321
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Telephone:
(415) 604-4500
dan@danjohnsonlawgroup.com
mario@danjohnsonlawgroup.com
robert@danjohnsonlawgroup.com
6
7
8
Sean P. DeBruine (No. 168071)
1259 El Camino Real, Suite 406
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 269-9140
sean@debruinelaw.com
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiff
IPSILIUM LLC
Sarah E. Piepmeier (SBN 227094)
Sarah A. Piazza (SBN 293626)
Elise S. Edlin (SBN 293756)
Andrew T. Ohlert (SBN 306443)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 439-1400
Facsimile: (415) 439-1500
sarah.piepmeier@kirkland.com
sarah.piazza@kirkland.com
elise.edlin@kirkland.com
andrew.ohlert@kirkland.com
Attorneys for Defendant
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
OAKLAND DIVISION
22
23
IPSILIUM LLC,
Plaintiff,
24
25
26
27
Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG (DMR)
v.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND
ADR DEADLINE
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Defendant.
28
Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
to Extend Mediation Deadline
Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG (DMR)
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Ipsilium LLC (“Ipsilium”) and
2
Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) (collectively, “the Parties”) hereby jointly stipulate and
3
agree as follows, subject to the approval of the Court, to extend the deadline to complete mediation:
4
WHEREAS, under the June 29, 2018 Joint Stipulation and Order to Extend Deadlines (Dkt.
5
No. 46) the deadline for the parties to complete mediation was extended one week, from August 31,
6
2018 to the current deadline of September 7, 2018; and
7
WHEREAS, Cisco served its Response Damages Contentions on August 22, 2018, the
8
parties recently made their claim construction disclosures under Pat. L.R. 4-3, and they will file a
9
Joint Claim Construction Statement on August 30, 2018; and
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
WHEREAS, the parties and the court-appointed mediator, Vicki Veenker, have scheduling
conflicts between August 30 and September 7, 2018; and
WHEREAS, the parties believe that the mediation process would be more effective if they
have additional time to consider each other’s claim construction and damages positions; and
WHEREAS, the parties have discussed the requested extension with Ms. Veenker, who
supports this stipulation; and
WHEREAS, the parties and Ms. Veenker have agreed to hold a mediation session on October
10, 2018;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request the Court to Order that the
19
deadline for completion of mediation be extended from September 7, 2018 to October 12, 2018. No
20
other deadlines will be affected by this change.
21
22
DATED: August 28, 2018
By /s/ Sean P. DeBruine
Sean P. DeBruine (No. 168071)
23
Attorney for Plaintiff
IPSILIUM, LLC
24
25
By /s/ Sarah E. Piepmeier
Sarah E. Piepmeier (No. 227094)
26
Attorney for Defendant
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
27
28
1
Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
to Extend Mediation Deadline
Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG (DMR)
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
DATED: _________
8/30/2018
4
_____________________________________
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.
10
11
DATED: August 28, 2018
/s/ Sean P. DeBruine
Sean P. DeBruine
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
to Extend Mediation Deadline
Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG (DMR)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?