Ipsilium LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Filing
89
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 88 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Daniel Johnson Jr. (No. 57409)
Mario Moore (No. 231644)
Robert G. Litts (No. 205984)
James A. Glenn (pro hac vice)
DAN JOHNSON LAW GROUP, LLP
400 Oyster Point Blvd., Suite 321
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Telephone:
(415) 604-4500
dan@danjohnsonlawgroup.com
mario@danjohnsonlawgroup.com
robert@danjohnsonlawgroup.com
james@danjohnsonlawgroup.com
7
8
9
Sean P. DeBruine (No. 168071)
1259 El Camino Real, Suite 406
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 269-9140
sean@debruinelaw.com
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Attorneys for Plaintiff
IPSILIUM LLC
Sarah E. Piepmeier (SBN 227094)
Elise S. Edlin (SBN 293756)
Andrew T. Ohlert (SBN 306443)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 439-1400
Facsimile: (415) 439-1500
sarah.piepmeier@kirkland.com
sarah.piazza@kirkland.com
elise.edlin@kirkland.com
andrew.ohlert@kirkland.com
18
19
Attorneys for Defendant
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
21
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
22
OAKLAND DIVISION
23
IPSILIUM LLC,
24
25
26
Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG
Plaintiff,
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO EXTEND DEADLINES
v.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
27
Defendant.
28
Joint Stipulation and Order
to Extend Deadlines
Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) and
2
Plaintiff Ipsilium LLC (“Ipsilium”) (collectively, “the Parties”) hereby jointly stipulate and agree,
3
subject to the approval of the Court, to briefly extend two briefing deadlines as shown in the table
4
below:
5
WHEREAS, Ipsilium attached both a redacted version (Dkt. No. 77-3) and a sealed version
6
(Dkt. No. 77-4) of its Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions to its Administrative
7
Motion to File Under Seal (Dkt. No. 77), which it filed on Friday, April 5, 2019;
8
WHEREAS, the Clerk instructed Ipsilium to re-file the redacted version (Dkt. No. 77-3) of
9
its Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions using the appropriate event on Monday,
10
April 8, 2019, and Ipsilium did so that day (Dkt. No. 79);
11
WHEREAS, the Clerk instructed Ipsilium to notice its Motion for Leave to Amend
12
Infringement Contentions (Dkt. Nos. 77-3, 77-4, 79) on Tuesday, April 9, 2019 (Dkt. No. 81), and
13
Ipsilium did so that day (Dkt. No. 83);
14
WHEREAS, on Wednesday, April 10, 2019, the Court continued the noticed hearing on
15
Ipsilium’s Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions (Dkt. Nos. 77-3, 77-4, 79) from
16
May 16, 2019 to May 22, 2019 (Dkt. No. 87);
17
18
19
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to clarify the briefing schedule given the multiple filings
initiating this motion and noticing the hearing;
WHEREAS, the Parties jointly stipulate and agree, subject to the approval of the Court, that
20
the briefing deadlines on Ipsilium’s Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions (Dkt.
21
Nos. 77-3, 77-4, 79) shall be briefly extended as set forth in the table below;
22
23
24
25
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that these brief extensions will not affect any other deadline in
the case;
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court extend the
deadlines as follows:
Action
26
27
Original
Deadline
Cisco’s Opposition to Motion for Leave to Amend
Ipsilium’s Reply in Support of Motion for Leave to Amend
Proposed
Deadline
4/22/19
4/29/19
4/24/19
5/2/19
28
1
Joint Stipulation and Order
to Extend Deadlines
Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG
1
2
DATED: April 12, 2019
By: /s/ Sarah E. Piepmeier
Sarah E. Piepmeier (No. 227094)
3
Attorney for Defendant
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
4
5
By: /s/ Robert G. Litts
Robert G. Litts (No. 205984)
6
Attorney for Plaintiff
IPSILIUM, LLC
7
8
ATTESTATION
9
10
11
12
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.
DATED: April 12, 2019
/s/ Sarah E. Piepmeier
Sarah E. Piepmeier
13
14
15
16
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
DATED: April 12, 2019
19
_____________________________________
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Joint Stipulation and Order
to Extend Deadlines
Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?