Ipsilium LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Filing 89

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 88 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Daniel Johnson Jr. (No. 57409) Mario Moore (No. 231644) Robert G. Litts (No. 205984) James A. Glenn (pro hac vice) DAN JOHNSON LAW GROUP, LLP 400 Oyster Point Blvd., Suite 321 South San Francisco, CA 94080 Telephone: (415) 604-4500 dan@danjohnsonlawgroup.com mario@danjohnsonlawgroup.com robert@danjohnsonlawgroup.com james@danjohnsonlawgroup.com 7 8 9 Sean P. DeBruine (No. 168071) 1259 El Camino Real, Suite 406 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 269-9140 sean@debruinelaw.com 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for Plaintiff IPSILIUM LLC Sarah E. Piepmeier (SBN 227094) Elise S. Edlin (SBN 293756) Andrew T. Ohlert (SBN 306443) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 439-1400 Facsimile: (415) 439-1500 sarah.piepmeier@kirkland.com sarah.piazza@kirkland.com elise.edlin@kirkland.com andrew.ohlert@kirkland.com 18 19 Attorneys for Defendant CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 21 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 22 OAKLAND DIVISION 23 IPSILIUM LLC, 24 25 26 Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 27 Defendant. 28 Joint Stipulation and Order to Extend Deadlines Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) and 2 Plaintiff Ipsilium LLC (“Ipsilium”) (collectively, “the Parties”) hereby jointly stipulate and agree, 3 subject to the approval of the Court, to briefly extend two briefing deadlines as shown in the table 4 below: 5 WHEREAS, Ipsilium attached both a redacted version (Dkt. No. 77-3) and a sealed version 6 (Dkt. No. 77-4) of its Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions to its Administrative 7 Motion to File Under Seal (Dkt. No. 77), which it filed on Friday, April 5, 2019; 8 WHEREAS, the Clerk instructed Ipsilium to re-file the redacted version (Dkt. No. 77-3) of 9 its Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions using the appropriate event on Monday, 10 April 8, 2019, and Ipsilium did so that day (Dkt. No. 79); 11 WHEREAS, the Clerk instructed Ipsilium to notice its Motion for Leave to Amend 12 Infringement Contentions (Dkt. Nos. 77-3, 77-4, 79) on Tuesday, April 9, 2019 (Dkt. No. 81), and 13 Ipsilium did so that day (Dkt. No. 83); 14 WHEREAS, on Wednesday, April 10, 2019, the Court continued the noticed hearing on 15 Ipsilium’s Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions (Dkt. Nos. 77-3, 77-4, 79) from 16 May 16, 2019 to May 22, 2019 (Dkt. No. 87); 17 18 19 WHEREAS, the Parties wish to clarify the briefing schedule given the multiple filings initiating this motion and noticing the hearing; WHEREAS, the Parties jointly stipulate and agree, subject to the approval of the Court, that 20 the briefing deadlines on Ipsilium’s Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions (Dkt. 21 Nos. 77-3, 77-4, 79) shall be briefly extended as set forth in the table below; 22 23 24 25 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that these brief extensions will not affect any other deadline in the case; NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court extend the deadlines as follows: Action 26 27 Original Deadline Cisco’s Opposition to Motion for Leave to Amend Ipsilium’s Reply in Support of Motion for Leave to Amend Proposed Deadline 4/22/19 4/29/19 4/24/19 5/2/19 28 1 Joint Stipulation and Order to Extend Deadlines Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG 1 2 DATED: April 12, 2019 By: /s/ Sarah E. Piepmeier Sarah E. Piepmeier (No. 227094) 3 Attorney for Defendant CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 4 5 By: /s/ Robert G. Litts Robert G. Litts (No. 205984) 6 Attorney for Plaintiff IPSILIUM, LLC 7 8 ATTESTATION 9 10 11 12 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories. DATED: April 12, 2019 /s/ Sarah E. Piepmeier Sarah E. Piepmeier 13 14 15 16 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 DATED: April 12, 2019 19 _____________________________________ Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Joint Stipulation and Order to Extend Deadlines Case No. 4-17-cv-07179-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?