ACF 2006 Corp. v. Farrise et al
Filing
106
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 95 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ACF 2006 Corp. Status Report re the status of proceedings in the state court to be filed by 8/20/2018. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/9/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2018)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
ACF 2006 CORP.,
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
10
CASE NO. 18-cv-00029-YGR
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
vs.
SIMONA A. FARRISE, ET AL.,
Re: Dkt. No. 95
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 95.) The
13
Court previously vacated the hearing on plaintiff’s motion due to defendants’ failure to file a
14
timely response on July 30, 2018. (Dkt. No. 102.) Defendant Kimberley Farrise subsequently
15
filed his response to the motion on August 7, 2018, in which he notes that his pending motion to
16
join plaintiff in the ongoing state court divorce proceedings is set for hearing before the Alameda
17
County Superior Court on August 16, 2018. (Dkt. No. 103.) Pursuant to the briefing schedule
18
previously set by this Court, plaintiff may file a reply in support of its motion by no later than
19
August 14, 2018.
20
However, as this Court has indicated numerous times, it is not inclined to encroach on the
21
family court’s primary role in deciding issues pertaining to the characterization and distribution of
22
community estates. Accordingly, by no later than August 20, 2018, the parties shall file a joint
23
statement advising the Court of the status of the proceedings in the state court. Once the Court is
24
in receipt of the parties’ submission, it will determine how to proceed on plaintiff’s pending
25
motion for summary judgment.
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 9, 2018
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?