ACF 2006 Corp. v. Farrise et al

Filing 106

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 95 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ACF 2006 Corp. Status Report re the status of proceedings in the state court to be filed by 8/20/2018. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/9/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 ACF 2006 CORP., Plaintiff, 7 8 9 10 CASE NO. 18-cv-00029-YGR ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT vs. SIMONA A. FARRISE, ET AL., Re: Dkt. No. 95 Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 95.) The 13 Court previously vacated the hearing on plaintiff’s motion due to defendants’ failure to file a 14 timely response on July 30, 2018. (Dkt. No. 102.) Defendant Kimberley Farrise subsequently 15 filed his response to the motion on August 7, 2018, in which he notes that his pending motion to 16 join plaintiff in the ongoing state court divorce proceedings is set for hearing before the Alameda 17 County Superior Court on August 16, 2018. (Dkt. No. 103.) Pursuant to the briefing schedule 18 previously set by this Court, plaintiff may file a reply in support of its motion by no later than 19 August 14, 2018. 20 However, as this Court has indicated numerous times, it is not inclined to encroach on the 21 family court’s primary role in deciding issues pertaining to the characterization and distribution of 22 community estates. Accordingly, by no later than August 20, 2018, the parties shall file a joint 23 statement advising the Court of the status of the proceedings in the state court. Once the Court is 24 in receipt of the parties’ submission, it will determine how to proceed on plaintiff’s pending 25 motion for summary judgment. 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 9, 2018 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?