ACF 2006 Corp. v. Farrise et al

Filing 69

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 52 Motion to Dismiss; denying without prejudice 65 Stipulation; denying without prejudice 16 Motion. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2018)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

ACF 2006 CORP.,
Plaintiff,

7

Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 52, 65
SIMONA A. FARRISE, ET AL.,
Defendants.

10
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

ORDER

vs.

8
9

CASE NO. 18-cv-00029-YGR

As stated on the record at the hearing held on April 24, 2018, the Court ORDERS as

12

follows:

13



Defendant Kimberley Farrise’s motion to dismiss plaintiff ACF 2006 Corp.’s (“ACF”)

14

complaint (Dkt. No. 52) is DENIED. The Court finds service of process on Kimberley Farrise

15

proper and ORDERS said defendant to respond to the complaint.

16



The stipulation for entry of a Court order executed by defendant Simona Farrise, in her

17

individual capacity and on behalf of defendant the Farrise Firm, and plaintiff ACF (Dkt. No.

18

65) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

19



ACF’s motion for a temporary protective order, right to attach order, and order for issuance of

20

writ of attachment (Dkt. No. 16) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. To the extent plaintiff files

21

a renewed motion that is specific to the Union Bank Account referenced in in the above-

22

mentioned stipulation, plaintiff may set said motion for hearing as early as 14 days from filing,

23

and defendants will have 7 days to respond.

24

This Order terminates Docket Numbers 16, 52, and 65.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: April 25, 2018
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE