Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.

Filing 53

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CHANGE THE HEARING DATE ON APPLE'S MOTION TO STRIKE re 52 Stiplation filed by Apple, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 2/28/18. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2018)

Case 4:18-cv-00361-PJH Document 52 Filed 02/27/18 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Clayton C. James (Cal. Bar No. 287800)
[e-mail]
Srecko “Lucky” Vidmar (Cal. Bar No. 241120)
[e-mail]
Alali Dagogo-Jack (Cal. Bar No. 302437)
[e-mail]
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
4085 Campbell Avenue, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

8
Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

OAKLAND DIVISION

13
14
15

UNILOC U.S.A, INC. and UNILOC
LUXEMBOURG, S.A,

16

Plaintiffs,

17

v.

18

APPLE INC.,

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Defendant.

Case No. 4:18-cv-00361-PJH
PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO CHANGE
THE HEARING DATE ON APPLE’S
MOTION TO STRIKE
DATE:
Wednesday, April 11, 2018
TIME:
9:00 a.m.
COURTROOM: 3, 3rd Floor
JUDGE: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:18-cv-00361-PJH Document 52 Filed 02/27/18 Page 2 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-7, Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Plaintiffs
Uniloc U.S.A., Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. (“Uniloc”) hereby stipulate and agree to move
the hearing date on Apple’s Motion to Strike from March 21, 2018 to April 11, 2018. Apple filed
its Motion to Strike (Dkt. 42) on February 8, 2018. Uniloc filed its Opposition on February 22,
2018 (Dkt. 50). In the meantime, this Court has issued the Related Case Order (Dkt. 49), relating
Case Nos. 18-cv-362 and 18-cv-364 with this case.
Apple had also filed a Motion to Strike in the -364 case, which is similar in substance and
relief sought to the one pending in this case. Uniloc’s opposition to that motion is substantively
identical to the one filed in this case. Because the -364 case was reassigned from Judge Tigar as a
result of the Related Case Order, Apple’s Motion to Strike in that case will have to be renoticed
for hearing before Judge Hamilton. The parties have conferred and agreed to set that Motion (and
a number of other pending motions in other related cases) for hearing on April 11, 2018.
As a result, it would be most efficient for the Court and also for the parties to move the
currently-scheduled hearing on the motion in the -361 case from March 21, 2018 to April 11,
2018. There have been no previous modifications to the hearing date on this, or any other
motion, in this case. The parties do not foresee any adverse effects of the requested hearing date
change on any other deadlines in the case, as the Motion is fully briefed with Apple having filed
its Reply (Dkt. 51) on February 26, 2018. The parties therefore request that the Court continue
the hearing on Apple’s Motion to Strike (Dkt. 42) to April 11, 2018.
Respectfully submitted on February 27, 2018.

21
22

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
PRINCE LOBEL TYE LLP

23

S

amilton

FO

LI

ER

R NIA

ERED

H
hyllis J.

Judge P

H

Dated: February 28, 2018

RT

28

O ORD
IT IS S

NO

27

Attorneys for Uniloc

A

26

By:/s/ Srecko “Lucky” Vidmar
Srecko “Lucky” Vidmar

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

25

By:/s/ James J. Foster
James J. Foster

UNIT
ED

24

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R 1

C

Attorneys for Apple