Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.

Filing 98

ORDER TO PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING SUR-REPLY. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/7/18. Show Cause Response due by 2/12/2018. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2018)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT

5

NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA

6
7

UNILOC USA INC., et al.,
U
A,
a
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 1
18-cv-00362
2-JSW
ORDER T PLAINT
TO
TIFFS TO S
SHOW
CAUSE R
REGARDING SUR-REP
PLY

v.

No.
Re: Dkt. N 96

APPLE INC.,
A
,
Defendant.
.

12
13

On Feb
bruary 7, 201 Plaintiffs filed a sur-r
18,
s
reply withou leave from the undersi
ut
m
igned to do

14

so, and the Nor
rthern District Civil Local Rules do not provide for sur-repli as a matt of right.
ies
ter

15

See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-3(d). This case was transferr in from th United St
e
L
w
red
the
tates District Court from
m

16

the Eastern Dis
e
strict of Texa and involved consolid
as
dated procee
edings and, t
thus, the doc in this
cket

17

cas may not be complete.
se
b

18

Accord
dingly, Plaint
tiffs are HER
REBY ORD
DERED TO S
SHOW CAU why the Court
USE
e

19

sho
ould conside their sur-re
er
eply. If they were previo
y
ously grante leave to fi a sur-repl to
ed
ile
ly

20

De
efendant’s motions by the District Co in Texas they shall provide a co of that o
m
ourt
s,
opy
order to the

21

Court. If they were not, they shall show cause why the Court s
w
y
should not st
trike the sur-reply.

22

Plaintif shall resp
ffs
pond to this Order to Sho Cause by February 12 2018.
O
ow
y
2,

23

IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.

24
25
26
27
28

Da
ated: Februar 7, 2018
ry
___
__________
___________
__________
________
JEF
FFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge