Johnson v. Express Auto Clinic, Inc. et al

Filing 80

ORDER Discharging 74 Order to Show Cause; Requiring Status Report. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 10/21/2019. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2019)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SCOTT JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 18-cv-00464-KAW

v.
ABDULNASSER ALSUMAIRI,
Defendant.

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE; REQUIRING STATUS
REPORT
Re: Dkt. No. 74

12
13

On January 29, 2019, Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement as to Defendant Abdulnasser

14

Alsumairi. (Dkt. No. 52.). On February 4, 2019, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a dismissal of

15

Defendant Alsumairi within 60 days. (Dkt. No. 54.)

16

Plaintiff did not file the dismissal of Defendant Alsumairi. On May 28, 2019, Plaintiff and

17

Defendant Alsumairi filed a joint status report. (Dkt. No. 62.) The parties stated that Defendant

18

Alsumairi’s counsel, Attorney Michael Welch, “has not been terribly responsive.” (Id. at 2.) On

19

May 6, 2019, Attorney Welch informed Plaintiff that Defendant Alsumairi had mailed the

20

payment to Attorney Welch’s office, and that Attorney Welch would forward the payment without

21

delay. (Id.) As of May 28, 2019, however, Plaintiff had not received the settlement funds. (Id.)

22

On July 17, 2019, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a dismissal of the case or a status

23

report within 60 days. (Dkt. No. 69.) The Court further stated: “If Attorney Welch has not

24

forwarded the settlement payment by then, Attorney Welch shall explain why he has failed to do

25

so, and explain why he should not be sanctioned and/or reported to the State Bar.” (Id. at 2.)

26

On September 13, 2019, Plaintiff filed a unilateral status report, stating that he had still not

27

received payment and the settlement had not been consummated. (Dkt. No. 73 at 2.) Plaintiff

28

further stated that Attorney “Welch has made no efforts since this Court’s July Order to move

1

settlement forward in any way,” and that although Plaintiff’s counsel had called, e-mailed, and

2

attempted to meet and confer with Attorney Welch, “each effort was ignored.” (Id.) Plaintiff

3

attached various e-mails to Attorney Welch that he had failed to respond to, including e-mails on

4

August 15, August 21, September 12, and September 13. (Seabock Decl., Exh. 1.) The e-mail

5

chain also included e-mails in which Attorney Welch repeatedly stated that the money would be

6

sent, but then apparently failed to do so. (Id.) Plaintiff further attached a September 6, 2019 letter

7

sent to Attorney Welch, raising the payment issue. Plaintiff stated that he would likely move to

8

enforce the terms of the settlement agreement, or to request that the case be reopened and seek

9

default against Defendant Alsumairi.
Attorney Welch did not file a response, despite the Court’s July 17, 2019 order. On

11

United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

September 17, 2019, the Court issued an order to show cause, requiring Attorney Welch to

12

explain: (1) why he had not provided the settlement payment, and (2) why he had not complied

13

with the Court’s order. (Order to Show Cause at 2, Dkt. No. 74.) The Court warned that failure to

14

comply would result in the imposition of sanctions and referral to the Northern District of

15

California’s Standing Committee on Professional Conduct and the California State Bar. The

16

Court set a show cause hearing for October 3, 2019, and ordered Attorney Welch to personally

17

appear. (Id.)

18

Attorney Welch again failed to file a response. Instead, on October 3, 2019, only a few

19

hours before the show cause hearing, Attorney Welch informed the Court that he had a medical

20

emergency. (Dkt. No. 76.) The Court continued the show cause hearing to October 17, 2019, and

21

ordered Attorney Welch to produce evidence of his medical emergency with a sworn affidavit on

22

or before the next hearing. (Id.)

23

On October 17, 2019, the Court held the show cause hearing. (Dkt. No. 79.) Attorney

24

Welch appeared at the hearing and provided a document, dated September 30, 2019, reminding

25

him that he had a scheduled medical appointment in Sacramento on the morning of October 3,

26

2019. Attorney Welch did not provide the required affidavit, nor did he adequately explain why

27

he did not earlier inform the Court of the conflict. With respect to his failure to comply with the

28

Court’s orders, Attorney Welch stated that he had suffered a stroke in June 2019, which had
2

1

limited his ability to practice and resulted in him referring out his cases and withdrawing from

2

others. Additionally, at the hearing, Plaintiff’s counsel clarified that they had, in fact, received

3

two payments on May 24, 2019 and August 6, 2019, and that there was an outstanding balance of

4

$4,500.1 Attorney Welch indicated that his client had mailed the $4,500 directly to Plaintiff’s

5

counsel, although Plaintiff’s counsel had not yet received it.
In light of Attorney Welch’s health problems and the fact that Attorney Welch has, despite

6
7

Plaintiff’s assertions, been moving forward with the settlement payments, the Court

8

DISCHARGES the order to show cause. The Court is concerned, however, that despite Attorney

9

Welch’s assertion that his ability to practice is limited and that he had been referring out his cases,
it appears that he has continued to take on new cases since his June 2019 stroke. (See Case No.

11

United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

19-cv-3878-KAW, Shaw v. Sparky’s Restaurant Co., Dkt. No. 12 (Aug. 19, 2019) (Attorney

12

Welch’s first appearance); Case No. 19-cv-3181-RS, Hernandez v. KB San Mateo, LLC, Dkt. No.

13

8 (July 24, 2019) (same); Case No. 19-cv-4033-RS, Ridola v. Stevens Creek Surplus Department

14

Store Inc., Dkt. No. 10 (Oct. 1, 2019) (same); Case No. 19-cv-4702, Johnson v. Saberi, Case No.

15

19-cv-2571-EJD, Dkt. No. 12 (July 30, 2019) (same); Case No. 19-cv-4705-EJD, Love v. Walia,

16

Dkt. No. 11 (September 16, 2019) (same).) Further, in light of his appearances and filings in these

17

other cases, it is unclear to the Court why Attorney Welch failed to respond to the Court’s orders

18

in this case, or why Attorney Welch represented that he had a medical emergency on October 3,

19

2019, when his unavailability was due to a pre-scheduled medical appointment. The Court also

20

notes that it is aware Attorney Welch has been referred to the Northern District of California’s

21

Committee on Professional Responsibility on similar issues in another pending case. Accordingly,

22

Attorney Welch is forewarned of his obligation to comply with all Court orders, or risk sanction.

23

The parties shall file a joint status report by November 1, 2019. If Attorney Welch does

24

not ensure that the settlement is paid by that date, and fails to adequately explain the delay, the

25

Court will refer Attorney Welch to the Northern District of California’s Committee on

26
27
28

This directly contradicts Plaintiff’s assertion in the September 13, 2019 status report that
Attorney Welch had made no efforts to move settlement forward since the July 17, 2019 order,
and that Plaintiff had not received payment. (See Dkt. No. 73 at 2.)
3
1

1
2
3

Professional Responsibility and the California State Bar.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 21, 2019
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4