ANTUNEZ-PADILLA v. Sessions et al

Filing 9

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Respondents show cause filing due by 3/22/2018. Petitioner's reply 4/5/18.Hearing set 4/17/18 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 1, Oakland before Judge Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/14/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 RONY ANTUNEZ-PADILLA, Petitioner, 7 8 9 10 CASE NO. 18-cv-00476-YGR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE vs. JEFF SESSIONS, ET AL., Respondents. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Petitioner Rony Antunez-Padilla has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 12 28 U.S.C. 2241, challenging the denial of a bond hearing by an immigration judge. Petitioner is in 13 the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement as part of an ongoing removal proceeding. 14 Petitioner seeks habeas relief arguing that he is entitled to a bond hearing pursuant to Diouf v. 15 Napolitano, 634 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2011). Here, the claims appear potentially colorable under 28 16 U.S.C. § 2241 and merit an answer from respondents. Moreover, given the allegation that 17 petitioner has been detained for over six months, an expedited response is warranted. 18 Respondents SHALL SHOW CAUSE why petitioner’s claim should not be granted, if that is 19 their position, by March 22, 2018. If respondents oppose the motion, petitioner shall reply by 20 April 5, 2018. 21 22 23 24 The clerk shall SERVE this order on petitioner and respondents. The Court sets the matter for hearing on Tuesday, April 17, 2018, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 1 of the United States Courthouse located at 1301 Clay Street in Oakland, California. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 14, 2018 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?