Johnson v. Berryhill

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED re 15 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Howard L. Johnson, Nancy A. Berryhill. Motions due by 8/27/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 7/16/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Dennis L. Kennelly, (SBN 064916) Law Office of Dennis L. Kennelly 9107 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 450 Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Phone: (650) 224-3113 Fax: (650) 752-4847 Email: kennelly.dennis@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiff Howard L. Johnson 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 HOWARD L. JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF, CASE NO.: 18-CV-00921 KAW VS. NANCY BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DOES 1 THROUGH X, ROES 1 THROUGH X, DEFENDANT(S) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. AS MODIFIED. 13 14 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 16(b)(4). Plaintiff Howard L. 15 Johnson (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Nancy Berryhill, et al (“Defendants”) hereby 16 stipulate and agree as follows: 17 18 WHEREAS, the Motion for Summary Judgment, currently due on or about July 13, 2018 be extended for 45 days; 19 WHEREAS, the Plaintiff requests that the Defendants provide to the Plaintiff 20 and the Plaintiff’s Counsel a full and complete copy of the Audio recording of October 21 30, 2015, to include the Pre-Hearing, Hearing and Post-Hearing as soon as a cd can 22 be produced and the Audio provided be in .MP3 format. 23 24 25 For the Purpose of Expediency of review, the Plaintiff’s address is as follows: Howard L. Johnson 1161 Willow Road, Apt 5 Menlo Park, CA 94025 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. – Pg 1 1 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, and 2 based on the foregoing circumstances, request that the Court establish the following 3 modified deadlines: 4  5 The Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment scheduled for July 13, 2018 is continued to August 27, 2018. 6  7 Date: July 16, 2018 The remainder of DOC 3, Procedural Orders 3, 4 & 5 remain in effect. Law Office of Dennis L. Kennelly 8 /s/ Dennis L. Kennelly_________________ Dennis L. Kennelly Attorney for Plaintiff, Howard L. Johnson 9 10 11 Date: July 16, 2018 /s/ Francesco P. Benavides____________ Francesco P. Benavides Attorney for Defendant 12 13 14 15 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED: The Plaintiff’s deadline to file his Motion for Summary Judgment is continued 16 to August 27, 2018. 17 16 Dated: July ___, 2018 18 19 ____________________________________ Kandis A. Westmore United States District Magistrate Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. – Pg 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?