TechShop, Inc. v. Rasure et al

Filing 117

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 116 JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TOSHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE DAUBERTMOTIONS. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2019)

Case 4:18-cv-01044-HSG Document 117 Filed 03/25/19 Page 1 of 6

1

COUNSEL LISTED ON NEXT PAGE

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

10
TECHSHOP, INC., a California
corporation, DORIS A. KAELIN, in her
capacity as Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee for
TECHSHOP, INC.,

11
12
13

Plaintiff,

14

v.

15

DAN RASURE et al.

16

Defendants.

17

JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON
MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE DAUBERT
MOTIONS
Pretrial Conference: April 30, 2019, 3:00 p.m.
Trial: June 3, 2019, 8:00 a.m.

______________________________________

18

Case No: 4:18-cv-01044-HSG (JCS)

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

(d (

Case No. 4:118-CV-01044-HSG (JCS)
JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO
FILE DAUBERT MOTIONS

Case 4:18-cv-01044-HSG Document 117 Filed 03/25/19 Page 2 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

James C. Pistorino (Bar No. 226496)
[e-mail]
Parrish Law Offices
224 Lexington Dr.
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendants.
Ann McFarland Draper (Bar No. 065669)
[e-mail]
Draper Law Offices
75 Broadway, Suite 202
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129)
[e-mail]
Andrea Pallios Roberts (Bar No. 228128)
[e-mail]
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Ed DeFranco (Bar No. 165596)
[e-mail]
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10010
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
John E. Nathan (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
John E. Nathan LLC
1175 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10128
Telephone:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2Case No. 4:118-CV-01044-HSG (JCS)
JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTIONS FOR
LEAVE TO FILE DAUBERT MOTIONS

Case 4:18-cv-01044-HSG Document 117 Filed 03/25/19 Page 3 of 6

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-11 of the Northern District of California,

2

Plaintiff and Counter-defendants (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants and Counterclaimants

3

(“Defendants”) (collectively, “the Parties”) in the above-captioned case submit this Joint Motion

4

for Administrative Relief Shortening Time for the Parties’ Motion for Leave to File Daubert

5

Motions (Dkts. 112 and 114) in this case.

6
7
8
9

WHEREAS, the Parties each stipulated to the opposing party seeking leave to file a
Daubert Motion, under the terms set forth in Dkt. 106;
WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion for Leave to File Daubert Motion against Eric
Matolo, Ph.D. (“Defendants’ Motion for Leave”) (Dkt. 112);

10

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to File Daubert Motion (Dkt. 114);

11

WHEREAS, the Pretrial Conference is scheduled for April 30, 2019, 3:00 p.m.;

12

WHEREAS, trial in this matter is scheduled to begin on June 3, 2019; and

13

WHEREAS, the earliest available hearing date on the Parties’ respective Motions for

14
15

Leave is June 20, 2019, after the trial date in this matter;
The parties stipulate and agree, through their undersigned counsel of record, that neither

16

party will file an opposition to the opposing party’s Motion for Leave (Dkt. 106), and that the

17

Court may decide the Parties’ Motions for Leave without a hearing.

18

The Parties further respectfully request that the Court shorten time to resolve the Parties’

19

respective Motions for Leave so that, to the extent the Court grants the Motion(s) for Leave, the

20

Court so rules sufficiently in advance of the Pretrial Conference to allow for full briefing on the

21

Daubert motion(s) prior to the Pretrial Conference.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3Case No. 4:118-CV-01044-HSG (JCS)
JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTIONS FOR
LEAVE TO FILE DAUBERT MOTIONS

Case 4:18-cv-01044-HSG Document 117 Filed 03/25/19 Page 4 of 6

1

DATED: March 22, 2019

DATED: March 22, 2019

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

By /s/ James C. Pistorino
James C. Pistorino (Bar No. 226496)
[e-mail]
Parrish Law Offices
224 Lexington Dr.
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]

By
/s/ Andrea Pallios Roberts
Ann McFarland Draper (Bar No. 065669)
[e-mail]
Draper Law Offices
75 Broadway, Suite 202
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendants QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129)
[e-mail]
Andrea Pallios Roberts (Bar No. 228128)
[e-mail]
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Ed DeFranco (Bar No. 165596)
[e-mail]
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10010
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

19

John E. Nathan (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
John E. Nathan LLC
1175 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10128
Telephone:
[phone]

20

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants

17
18

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4Case No. 4:118-CV-01044-HSG (JCS)
JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTIONS FOR
LEAVE TO FILE DAUBERT MOTIONS

Case 4:18-cv-01044-HSG Document 117 Filed 03/25/19 Page 5 of 6

1
2
3

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained from James C. Pistorino.

4
5

/s/ Andrea Pallios Roberts
Andrea Pallios Roberts

_____

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5Case No. 4:118-CV-01044-HSG (JCS)
JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTIONS FOR
LEAVE TO FILE DAUBERT MOTIONS

Case 4:18-cv-01044-HSG Document 117 Filed 03/25/19 Page 6 of 6

1
2
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED
The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation, and finding good cause, hereby issues an
Order as follows:

4
1. Neither party will file an opposition to the opposing party’s Motion for Leave

5

(Dkts. 112 & 114);

6

2. The Court may decide the Parties’ Motions for Leave without a hearing;

7

3. The Court will shorten time to resolve the Parties’ respective Motions for Leave.

8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12
13

DATED:

3/25/2019

The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-6Case No. 4:118-CV-01044-HSG (JCS)
JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTIONS FOR
LEAVE TO FILE DAUBERT MOTIONS