TechShop, Inc. v. Rasure et al

Filing 171

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 170 Stipulation to Modify Briefing Schedule and Hearing on Non-Party Witnesses Motion to Modify Defendants Subpoena.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2019)

Download PDF
Case 4:18-cv-01044-HSG Document 171 Filed 05/03/19 Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ALLAN E. ANDERSON (SBN 133672) TRACY LUU-VARNES (SBN 281165) ARENT FOX LLP 555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90013-1065 Telephone: 213.629.7400 Facsimile: 213.629.7401 Email: allan.anderson@arentfox.com tracy.luu-varnes@arentfox.com Attorneys for Non-Parties DANIEL WOODS and MIKE HILBERMAN 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION 10 11 12 13 TECHSHOP, INC. a California corporation, DORIS A. KAELIN, in her capacity as Chapter 7 trustee for TECHOP, INC. Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 18 v. DAN RASURE, an individual residing in Kansas, TECHSHOP 2.0 LLC, a Kansas limited liability corporation, TECHSHOP 2.0 SAN FRANCISCO LLC, a Kansas limited liability corporation, 19 Defendants. CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01044-HSG STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON NON-PARTY WITNESSES MOTION TO MODIFY DEFENDANTS’ SUBPOENA TO LIMIT SCOPE OF TESTIMONY AT TRIAL, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, A MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER [Declaration of Tracy Luu-Varnes in support of filed and lodged concurrently herewith and in support hereof] 20 21 22 Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION; PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01044-HSG (JCS) A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES AFDOCS/17986225.2 Case 4:18-cv-01044-HSG Document 171 Filed 05/03/19 Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, counsel for the parties and non-party witnesses Mike Hilberman and Daniel Woods (the “Parties”) hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on April 25, 2019, non-party witnesses Mike Hilberman and 4 Daniel Woods filed their Motion to Modify Defendants’ Subpoena to Limit Scope 5 of Testimony at Trial, or in the Alternative, A Motion for Productive Order (ECF 6 No. 159) (“Motion”), which, based on the Court’s rules, availability and scheduling 7 notes, is currently set to be heard on August 22, 2019; 8 9 10 WHEREAS, trial on this matter is currently scheduled to begin on June 3, 2019, over three months before the Motion will be heard; WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to the following revised briefing 11 schedule and hearing date to allow the Motion to be heard prior to the 12 commencement June 3, 2019 trial: 13 14 Hearing on Motion May 23, 2019 at 2:00 p.m., or another 15 date prior to May 30, 2019 in advance 16 of the June 3, 2019 trial that is 17 convenient with the Court 18 Deadline to file Opposition May 10, 2019 19 Deadline to file Reply May 16, 2019 20 21 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the 22 Parties, through their respective counsel and subject to the Court’s approval, that 23 the hearing on the Motion will take place on May 23, 2019 at 2:00 p.m., or another 24 date prior to May 30, 2019 in advance of the June 3, 2019 trial that is convenient 25 with the Court, and the briefing schedule for the Motion will be as follows: 26 - the Opposition, if any, will be filed on or before May 10, 2019; and 27 - the Reply, if any, will be filed on or before May 16, 2019. 28 -2- A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW STIPULATION; PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01044-HSG (JCS) LOS ANGELES AFDOCS/17986225.2 Case 4:18-cv-01044-HSG Document 171 Filed 05/03/19 Page 3 of 6 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, 2 3 4 5 Dated: May 2, 2019 ARENT FOX LLP 6 By: /s/ Tracy Luu-Varnes ALLAN E. ANDERSON TRACY LUU-VARNES Attorneys for Non-Party Witnesses Daniel Woods and Mike Hilberman 7 8 9 10 11 Dated: May 2, 2019 PARRISH LAW OFFICE 12 13 By: /s/ James Charles Pistonino James Charles Pistorino Parrish Law Office Attorneys for Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW STIPULATION; PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01044-HSG (JCS) LOS ANGELES AFDOCS/17986225.2 Case 4:18-cv-01044-HSG Document 171 Filed 05/03/19 Page 4 of 6 1 Dated: May 2, 2019 2 By: /s/ Andrea Pallios Roberts Ann McFarland Draper courts@draperlaw.net Draper Law Offices 75 Broadway, Suite 202 San Francisco, Ca 94111 Telephone: (415) 989-5620 3 4 5 6 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Kevin P.B. Johnson kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com Andrea Pallios Roberts andreaproberts@quinnemanuel.com 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 7 8 9 10 11 Ed Franco eddfranco@quinnemanuel.com 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010 Telephone: (212) 849-7000 12 13 14 John E. Nathan (Pro Hac Vice) jnathan155@yahoo.com John E. Nathan LLC New York, NY 10128 Telephone: (917) 960-1667 15 16 17 18 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW STIPULATION; PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01044-HSG (JCS) LOS ANGELES AFDOCS/17986225.2 Case 4:18-cv-01044-HSG Document 171 Filed 05/03/19 Page 5 of 6 1 DECLARATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1 2 I, Tracy Luu-Varnes, hereby declare pursuant to Civil Local Rules 5-1(i)(3), I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. 3 4 5 Executed this 2nd day of May, 2019, in Los Angeles, California. 6 7 8 By: /s/ Tracy Luu-Varnes TRACY LUU-VARNES 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5- A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW STIPULATION; PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01044-HSG (JCS) LOS ANGELES AFDOCS/17986225.2 Case 4:18-cv-01044-HSG Document 171 Filed 05/03/19 Page 6 of 6 1 ORDER 2 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 Dated: May 3, 2019 _________ ___ 8 9 JUDGE HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM,JR. United States District Court Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -6- A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW STIPULATION; PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01044-HSG (JCS) LOS ANGELES AFDOCS/17986225.2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?