TechShop, Inc. v. Rasure et al

Filing 186

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 185 Stipulation to Limit the Testimony of Daniel Woods at Trial. (Docket No. 159 Motion for Protective Order is terminated as moot). (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ALLAN E. ANDERSON (SBN 133672) TRACY LUU-VARNES (SBN 281165) ARENT FOX LLP 555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90013-1065 Telephone: 213.629.7400 Facsimile: 213.629.7401 Email: allan.anderson@arentfox.com tracy.luu-varnes@arentfox.com Attorneys for non-parties MIKE HILBERMAN and DANIEL WOODS _________ 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 TECHSHOP, INC. a California corporation, DORIS A. KAELIN, in her capacity as Chapter 7 trustee for TECHSHOP, INC. Plaintiff, v. DAN RASURE, an individual residing in Kansas, TECHSHOP 2.0 LLC, a Kansas limited liability corporation, TECHSHOP 2.0 SAN FRANCISCO LLC, a Kansas limited liability corporation, CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01044-HSG (JCS) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO LIMIT THE TESTIMONY OF DANIEL WOODS AT TRIAL Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 24 25 26 27 28 A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES STIPULATION AND ORDER TO LIMIT THE TESTIMONY CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01044-HSG (JCS) 1 2 3 Counsel for the parties and non-party witnesses Mike Hilberman and Daniel Woods (the “Parties”) hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on April 25, 2019, non-party witnesses Mike Hilberman and 4 Daniel Woods filed their Motion to Modify Defendants’ Subpoena to Limit Scope 5 of Testimony at Trial, or in the Alternative, A Motion for Productive Order (ECF 6 No. 159) (“Motion”); 7 WHEREAS, on May 3, 2019, the Court granted the parties stipulation to re- 8 schedule the hearing on the Motion from August 22, 2019 to May 23, 2019 (ECF 9 Nos. 171); 10 11 12 WHEREAS, Mssrs. Woods and Hilberman are defendants or potential parties in the following matters: - John S. and James L. Knight Foundation v. TechShop San Jose, LLC, 13 Early Growth Financial Services, Inc., Mike Hilberman and Daniel 14 Woods, Case No. 18CV330565 –pending in the Superior Court of the 15 State of California, County of Santa Clara (“Knight Foundation 16 Lawsuit”); and 17 - The Bankruptcy Trustee’s threatened lawsuit against Mr. Woods and Mr. 18 Hilberman in the bankruptcy action entitled In re TechShop, Inc., Case 19 No. 18-50398 (MEH), which is pending in the United States District 20 Court, Northern District of California (“Trustee’s Action”). 21 22 23 - The Knight Foundation Lawsuit and the Trustee’s Action are collectively referred to as “The Other Matters”. WHEREAS, the Motion seeks to limit and exclude the testimony sought of 24 Mssrs. Hilberman and Woods regarding The Other Matters, which are wholly 25 unrelated and irrelevant to the subject lawsuit, and/or otherwise protected by the 26 attorney-client and/or “work product” privileges; 27 28 A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES WHEREAS, on May 8, 2019, the Court granted TechShop, Inc.’s motion in limine to exclude Mr. Hilberman from testifying at trial (ECF No. 182); -2- STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01044-HSG (JCS) 1 2 WHEREAS, as a result of the Court’s order excluding Mr. Hilberman from testifying at trial, the Motion, as it pertains to Mr. Hilberman, is moot; 3 WHEREAS, the Parties have further met and conferred regarding the subject 4 matter of the Motion as it pertains to Mr. Woods and have agreed to a resolution to 5 avoid a hearing on the Motion; 6 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the 7 Parties, through their respective counsel and subject to the Court’s approval that the 8 Parties will not seek to elicit any testimony from Dan Woods regarding The Other 9 Matters, including any communications between Mr. Woods and his counsel 10 11 regarding The Other Matters; IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT notwithstanding the 12 foregoing, nothing in this Stipulation is intended, nor shall it be construed, to limit 13 Defendants’ right to elicit any testimony from Mr. Woods regarding TechShop, 14 Inc.’s alleged fraud and/or alleged misrepresentation, but to the extent the Parties 15 do so, the testimony sought will be limited to communications and dealings with 16 Dan Rasure and the parties in the subject action, or related to the events described 17 in the complaint and counterclaim in this subject action or the consequences 18 thereof, without reference to The Other Matters. 19 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT this Stipulation 20 does not impact Defendants’ right to elicit testimony from Mr. Woods regarding the 21 remainder of the issues disclosed in their Trial Witness List as to Mr. Woods. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES Dated: May 13, 2019 ARENT FOX LLP By: /s/ Tracy Luu-Varnes ALLAN E. ANDERSON TRACY LUU-VARNES Attorneys for Non-Party Witnesses Mike Hilberman and Daniel Woods -3- STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01044-HSG (JCS) 1 2 Dated: May 13, 2019 PARRISH LAW OFFICE 3 By: /s/ James Charles Pistorino James Charles Pistorino Parrish Law Office Attorneys for Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES Dated: May 13, 2019 By: /s/ Andrea Pallios Roberts Ann McFarland Draper courts@draperlaw.net Draper Law Offices 75 Broadway, Suite 202 San Francisco, Ca 94111 Telephone: (415) 989-5620 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Kevin P.B. Johnson kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com Andrea Pallios Roberts andreaproberts@quinnemanuel.com 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Ed Franco eddfranco@quinnemanuel.com 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010 Telephone: (212) 849-7000 John E. Nathan (Pro Hac Vice) jnathan155@yahoo.com John E. Nathan LLC New York, NY 10128 Telephone: (917) 960-1667 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants -4- STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01044-HSG (JCS) 1 DECLARATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1 2 I, Tracy Luu-Varnes, hereby declare pursuant to Civil Local Rules 5-1(i)(3), I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. 3 4 5 Executed this 13th day of May, 2019, in Los Angeles, California. 6 7 8 9 By _/s/ Tracy Luu-Varnes_________ TRACY LUU-VARNES 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES -5- STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01044-HSG (JCS) 1 ORDER 2 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dated: 5/14/2019 JUDGE HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Court Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES -6- STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01044-HSG (JCS)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?