Economus v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 24

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. granting 22 Stipulation SETTING CASE SCHEDULE. Discovery due by 11/30/2018; Designation of Experts due by 12/14/2018; Designation of Rebuttal Experts due by 1/4/2019; Close of Expert Discovery due by 1/18/2019; Dispositive Motion due by 1/22/2019; Motion Hearing set for 2/28/2019 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/16/2019 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor; Jury Selection /Jury Trial (7-day) set for 4/22/2019 08:30 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney CHERYL ADAMS, State Bar #164194 Chief Trial Deputy BRIAN P. CEBALLO, State Bar #243828 REBECCA A. BERS, State Bar #287111 Deputy City Attorneys Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-3911 [Ceballo] Telephone: (415) 554-4224 [Bers] Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 E-Mail: brian.ceballo@sfcityatty.org E-Mail: rebecca.bers@sfcityatty.org Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANTHONY ECONOMUS, Plaintiff, Case No. 18-cv-01071 HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE SCHEDULE vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN Trial Date: FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation; City of San Francisco Police Officer; DOES 1-50, INCLUSIVE April 22, 2019 Defendants. 21 22 STIPULATION 23 24 25 Pursuant to Docket No. 21, the parties, through counsel, have met and conferred and based on their respective schedules, they stipulate to the following case schedule: 26 27 28 Stipulation and Order re Case Schedule Economus v. CCSF; USDC No. 18-cv-1071 HSG 1 c:\users\rileyn\appdata\local\temp\notes06e812\01278818.docx 1 Early Neutral Evaluation: on or before August 27, 2018 2 Close of Non-Monell Discovery: November 30, 2018 3 Deadline for Filing Dispositive Motions: January 22, 2019 4 Deadline for Hearing Dispositive Motions: February 28, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. 5 Expert Disclosure: December 14, 2018 6 Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: January 4, 2019 7 Close of Expert Discovery: January 18, 2019 8 Pretrial conference: April 16, 2019 at 3:00 p.m. 9 Trial: April 22, 2019 10 11 Dated: May 29, 2018 12 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney CHERYL ADAMS Chief Trial Deputy BRIAN P. CEBALLO REBECCA A. BERS Deputy City Attorneys 13 14 15 16 By: 17 /s/ Brian P. Ceballo BRIAN P. CEBALLO 18 Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 19 20 21 Dated: May 29, 2018 22 THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 23 24 By: /s/ Patrick M. Buelna PATRICK M. BUELNA 25 Attorneys for Plaintiff ANTHONY ECONOMUS 26 27 28 Stipulation and Order re Case Schedule Economus v. CCSF; USDC No. 18-cv-1071 HSG 2 c:\users\rileyn\appdata\local\temp\notes06e812\01278818.docx ORDER 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPUL LATION, th foregoing ordered: he 3 Early Neutral Evaluation: E l fore August 27, 2018 on or bef 4 Close of Non C n-Monell Dis scovery: Novemb 30, 2018 ber 5 Deadline for Filing Dispo D F ositive Motio ons: January 22, 2019 6 Deadline for Hearing Dis D H spositive Mo otions: February 28, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. y t 7 Expert Disclo E osure: December 14, 2018 8 Rebuttal Expe Disclosur R ert re: January 4, 2019 9 Close of Expe Discover C ert ry: January 18, 2019 10 0 Pretrial confe erence: 6, 00 April 16 2019 at 3:0 p.m. 11 1 Trial: T April 22, 2019 12 2 13 3 14 4 IT IS SO ORD T DERED. 15 5 16 6 M Dated: May 30, 2018 17 7 __________ __________ ___________ __________ ______ THE HONO ORABLE HA AYWOOD S. GILLIAM JR. M, UNITED ST TATES DIS STRICT COU URT JUDGE 18 8 19 9 20 0 21 1 22 2 23 3 24 4 25 5 26 6 27 7 28 8 Stipulation and Order re Case Schedule n e Economus v. CCSF; USD No. 18-cv-1071 HSG DC 3 c:\users\riley yn\appdata\local\temp\notes06e812\0 01278818.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?