Purnell v. Rudolph and Sletten Inc.
Filing
151
ORDER DENYING 144 SECOND MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2019) ***The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 10/18/2019 a copy of this order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing specifically sent to Georgette G. Purnell.*** Modified on 10/18/2019 (kcS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
GEORGETTE G. PURNELL,
v.
9
10
Case No. 18-cv-01402-PJH
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION
FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
RUDOLPH AND SLETTEN INC.,
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Re: Dkt. No. 144
12
13
The court is in receipt of plaintiff Georgette G. Purnell’s October 7, 2019 motion for
14
review or reconsideration under Civil Local Rule 72-2 from a non-dispositive discovery
15
order issued by Magistrate Judge Kandis Westmore on August 19, 2019 (Dkt. 144). On
16
September 23, 2019, the court denied a materially identical motion filed by plaintiff (Dkt.
17
140). For the same reasons set forth in its order on that motion, the instant motion is
18
DENIED.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The court will entertain no further motions concerning Magistrate Judge
Westmore’s August 19, 2019 discovery order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 18, 2019
/s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?