Gilton v. Brighter Beginnings

Filing 41

ORDER discharging 36 3/6/19 Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 4/5/2019. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/5/2019: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ivaS, COURTSTAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GINA GILTON, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 v. Case No. 4:18-cv-01425-KAW ORDER DISCHARGING 3/6/19 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 36 BRIGHTER BEGINNINGS, Defendant. On March 6, 2019, the Court issued an order to show to Plaintiff to explain why she failed 13 to appear at the February 26, 2019 case management conference. (Dkt. No. 36.) Plaintiff also 14 failed to appear at the March 12, 2019 telephonic scheduling conference before Magistrate Judge 15 Sallie Kim. (Dkt. No. 37.) 16 On March 21, 2019, Plaintiff responded to the order to show cause and explained that a 17 change of address was submitted to the post office due to mail theft in her community, and that 18 she did not receive notice of the case management conference. (Dkt. No. 38.) Therein, Plaintiff 19 also provided notice of her change of address. Id. 20 Accordingly, the order to show cause is DISCHARGED. Plaintiff is reminded that the next 21 case management conference will be held on June 25, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. at U.S. District Court, 22 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California in a courtroom to be determined. The case management 23 statements are due on or before June 18, 2019. 24 25 26 27 28 Additionally, Plaintiff is ordered to contact Judge Kim’s courtroom deputy, Melinda Lozenski, at (415) 522-4158 to schedule another telephonic scheduling conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 5, 2019 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?