Popal v. Rash Curtis & Associates
Filing
29
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/23/2019. (pjhlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2019)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ABDULLAH POPAL,
v.
9
10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES,
Re: Dkt. No. 28
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 18-cv-01511-PJH
Plaintiff,
8
12
13
The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have
14
15
agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action
16
is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to
17
this court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof on the opposing party, that the
18
agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order
19
shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for
20
trial.
21
If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty days, the dismissal shall be with
22
prejudice. The parties may, of course, substitute a dismissal with prejudice at any time
23
during this sixty day period.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: January 23, 2019
__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?