Ornstein et al v. Canites et al
Filing
65
ORDER RE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
GERALD ORNSTEIN, et al.,
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 18-cv-01616-PJH
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
GIBSON T. CANITES, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER RE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
Re: Dkt. No. 64
12
13
The court is in receipt of defendants’ motion for leave to file a motion for
14
reconsideration or a renewed motion to set aside default. Having reviewed the submitted
15
materials, the court finds that defendants have not satisfied the requirements of L.R. 7-9.
16
Accordingly, the court DENIES defendants’ motion for leave to file a motion for
17
reconsideration.
18
However, in view of defendants obtaining new counsel and based upon the
19
information and reasons expressed in defendants’ filing, the court finds good cause to
20
GRANT defendants’ leave to file a renewed motion to set aside default. That motion
21
shall be filed by December 31, 2018.
22
In light of the above, the January 9, 2019 deadline for plaintiffs to file their motion
23
for default judgment is VACATED. That deadline will be reset if the court denies
24
defendants’ renewed motion.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 13, 2018
__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?