Hallisey v. Zuckerberg et al

Filing 127

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 126 Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule for 124 Motion for Permanent Injunction of State Proceedings. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Orin Snyder (pro hac vice) osnyder@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166-0193 Telephone: 212.351.4000 Facsimile: 212.351.4035 Joshua S. Lipshutz (SBN 242557) jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036-5306 Telephone: 202.955.8500 Facsimile: 202.467.0539 Kristin A. Linsley (SBN 154148) klinsley@gibsondunn.com Brian M. Lutz (SBN 255976) blutz@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 Paul J. Collins (SBN 187709) pcollins@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1881 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1211 Telephone: 650.849.5300 Facsimile: 650.849.5333 Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Facebook, Inc., and for Defendants Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Marc Andreessen, Peter Thiel, Reed Hastings, Erskine Bowles, Susan Desmond-Hellmann, and Jan Koum 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 IN RE FACEBOOK, INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE PRIVACY LITIGATION 17 18 This Document Relates To: 19 ALL ACTIONS LEAD CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01792-HSG STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR FACEBOOK’S MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION OF STATE PROCEEDINGS; ORDER Date First Action Filed: March 22, 2018 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION LEAD CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01792-HSG 1 WHEREAS, on June 28, 2019, Plaintiff John O’Connor (“O’Connor”) filed a complaint in the 2 action captioned O’Connor v. Zuckerberg, Case No. 19-CIV-03759, in the Superior Court of the State 3 4 5 6 of California for the County of San Mateo (the “O’Connor Action”), which is a derivative action purportedly brought on behalf of Nominal Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) against the members of Facebook’s Board of Directors relating to purported user privacy issues; 7 WHEREAS, on August 1, 2019, Facebook filed in this action a motion to enjoin the O’Connor 8 Action pursuant to the relitigation exception to the Anti-Injunction Act (ECF No. 124 (the “Injunction 9 Motion”)); 10 11 WHEREAS, the hearing on the Injunction Motion is set for January 9, 2020; WHEREAS, the parties in this action and the O’Connor Action wish to enter into a schedule 12 13 14 for briefing the Injunction Motion; WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, Facebook filed in the O’Connor Action a motion to stay that 15 proceeding pending this Court’s ruling on the Injunction Motion, which is scheduled to be heard on 16 October 1, 2019; and 17 18 19 20 21 WHEREAS, the parties wish to reserve all of their respective rights and defenses, including Facebook’s right to move to shorten the time to brief and/or hear the Injunction Motion following a decision in the O’Connor Action on Facebook’s motion to stay, and the right of the Plaintiffs in this action (the “Federal Plaintiffs”) to oppose such a motion. 22 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Facebook, 23 Federal Plaintiffs, and O’Connor, through their designated counsel of record, and subject to approval 24 of the Court, as follows: 25 26 1. The deadline to file any opposition to the Injunction Motion shall be extended from August 15, 2019 to September 20, 2019. 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1 STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION LEAD CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01792-HSG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2. The deadline to file any reply in further support of the Injunction Motion shall be extended from August 22, 2019 to October 15, 2019. 3. Notwithstanding this stipulation, the parties’ rights are expressly reserved, including Facebook’s right to move to shorten the time to brief and/or hear the Injunction Motion following a decision in the O’Connor Action on Facebook’s motion to stay, and the Federal Plaintiffs’ right to oppose such a motion. 4. The parties further agree that Mr. O’Connor is appearing specially in this action for the purpose of opposing this motion, and that his appearance will not be used against him in any fashion. 10 11 Dated: August 13, 2019 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 12 13 By: 14 15 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Email: blutz@gibsondunn.com 16 17 Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Facebook, Inc., and for Defendants Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Marc Andreessen, Peter Thiel, Reed Hastings, Erskine Bowles, Susan DesmondHellmann, and Jan Koum 18 19 20 21 /s/ Brian M. Lutz Brian M. Lutz Dated: August 13, 2019 COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY LLP 22 23 By: **/s/ Mark C. Molumphy Mark C. Molumphy 24 26 840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 Burlingame, CA 94010 Telephone: 650.697.6000 Email: mmolumphy@cpmlegal.com 27 Lead Counsel for Federal Plaintiffs 25 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 2 STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION LEAD CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01792-HSG 1 Dated: August 13, 2019 SAVERI & SAVERI, INC. 2 3 By: **/s/ R. Alexander Saveri R. Alexander Saveri 4 706 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415.217.6810 Email: rick@saveri.com 5 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff John O’Connor 8 ** Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the electronic filer has obtained approval from this signatory. 9 10 11 * * * 12 13 14 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 DATED: 8/14/2019 ______________________________________ HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 3 STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION LEAD CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01792-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?