Hallisey v. Zuckerberg et al

Filing 137

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 135 Administrative Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply Re 134 Reply to Opposition/Response. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2019)

1
2
3
4
5
6

R. Alexander Saveri (173102)
[e-mail]
Geoffrey C. Rushing (126910)
[e-mail]
Charlie Sweeny (325167)
[e-mail]
SAVERI & SAVERI, INC.
706 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8

Attorneys for Specially Appearing Party, John O’Connor

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

OAKLAND DIVISION

13
IN RE FACEBOOK, INC.
SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE
PRIVACY LITIGATION

LEAD CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01792-HSG

19

This Document Relates to:

20

ALL ACTIONS

Hearing:
Date:
Time:
Location:
Judge:

14
15
16

DENYING
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOHN
O’CONNOR’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY

17
18

21

January 9, 2020
2:00 p.m.
Courtroom 2, 4th Floor
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING JOHN O’CONNOR’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
GRANTING
SUR-REPLY; LEAD CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01792-HSG

1

On October 25, 2019, specially appearing party John O’Connor (“O’Connor”) filed a

2

motion for administrative relief, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11, seeking leave to file a sur-reply

3

to Nominal Defendant Facebook, Inc.’s (“Facebook”) Reply, ECF No. 134, in support of its

4

Motion for Permanent Injunction of State Proceedings, ECF No. 124. The Court finds good cause

5

for the Motion, and orders as follows:

6

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

7

1. O’Connor’s Administrative Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply is DENIED.
GRANTED; and

8

2. O’Connor shall file his Sur-Reply as a new docket entry within five (5) business days of
this order.

RT

15

Jud

16
17

Jr.

. Gilliam

H

ER

ood S
g e H ay w

R NIA

NO

14

ENIED

D
______________________________________
Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge

FO

13

10/31/2019
Date: __________________

LI

12

UNIT
ED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

11

S

10

A

9

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING JOHN O’CONNOR’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
GRANTING
SUR-REPLY; LEAD CASE NO. 4:18-CV-01792-HSG