ILWU Warehouse Welfare Trust et al v. Republic Services, Inc.

Filing 47

STIPULATION AND ORDER: Continuing Settlement Conference. Settlement Conference continued to June 4, 2019 at 10:00 am, Courtroom A, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 4/17/2019. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 MICHAEL G. CONGIU, Bar No. 0397018 mcongiu@littler.com MICHAEL R. LINK, Bar No. 0390019 mlink@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 1300 IDS Center 80 South 8th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402.2136 Telephone: 612.630.1000 Facsimile: 612.630.9626 Admitted Pro Hac Vice MATTHEW P. MINSER, Bar No. 296344 mminser@sjlawcorp.com ANA P. HALLMON, Bar No. 253309 ahallmon@sjlawcorp.com SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 1141 Harbor Bay Parkway, Suite 100 Alameda, CA 94502 Telephone: (510) 906-4710 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, ILWU Warehouse Welfare Trust, et al. COURTNEY M. OSBORN, Bar No. 312011 cosborn@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415.433.1940 Facsimile: 415.399.8490 Attorneys for Defendant REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 ILWU WAREHOUSE WELFARE TRUST; AND JAMES BEARD AND LARRY MORRISON, as Trustees of the ILWU Warehouse Welfare Trust, Case No. 4:18-cv-02118-YGR STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 18 Plaintiffs, 19 v. Date: Time: Place: June 4, 2019 10:00 a.m. Courtroom A, 15th Floor 20 REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC., 21 Defendant. Complaint Filed: April 6, 2018 Trial Date: None Set 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C . 333 Bush Street, Fl. 34 San Francisco, CA 94104 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 4:18-CV-02118-YGR 1 Subject to the approval of the Court, Defendant REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC. 2 (“Defendant”) and Plaintiffs ILWU WAREHOUSE WELFARE TRUST, JAMES BEARD, AND 3 LARRY MORRISON (“Plaintiffs”), through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to the 4 following: 5 WHEREAS, 6 1. 7 had been set by the Court for March 22, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.; 2. 8 9 On March 1, 2019, the Parties received notice that the Settlement Conference On March 11, 2019, the Parties received notice that the Settlement Conference had been reset by the Court from March 22, 2019 to April 19, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.; 10 2. The Defendant had a substitution of counsel on April 3, 2019; 11 3. The parties have checked the Court’s availability and request that the Court 12 continue the Settlement Conference from April 19, 2019 to June 4, 2019. 13 THEREFORE, 14 Subject to approval by the Court, Defendant and Plaintiff stipulate to continue the 15 Settlement Conference, and propose the following new date: June 4, 2019. . 16 17 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. Dated: April 17, 2019 Respectfully submitted, 19 /s/ Courtney M. Osborn Courtney M. Osborn LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant 20 21 22 Dated: April 17, 2019 Respectfully submitted, 23 /s/ Matthew P. Minser Matthew P. Minser Attorneys for Plaintiffs, ILWU Warehouse Welfare Trust, et al. 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C . 333 Bush Street, Fl. 34 San Francisco, CA 94104 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 1. Case No. 4:18-CV-02118-YGR 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 The Settlement Conference is continued to June 4, 2019 @ 10:00 a.m. 4 Dated: April _____, 2019 17 5 THOMAS S. HIXON United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 Settlement Conference Statements shall be lodged no later than May 28, 2019. 8 FIRMWIDE:163920512.2 068119.1792 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C . 333 Bush Street, Fl. 34 San Francisco, CA 94104 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 2. Case No. 4:18-CV-02118-YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?