ILWU Warehouse Welfare Trust et al v. Republic Services, Inc.
Filing
47
STIPULATION AND ORDER: Continuing Settlement Conference. Settlement Conference continued to June 4, 2019 at 10:00 am, Courtroom A, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 4/17/2019. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
MICHAEL G. CONGIU, Bar No. 0397018
mcongiu@littler.com
MICHAEL R. LINK, Bar No. 0390019
mlink@littler.com
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
1300 IDS Center
80 South 8th Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402.2136
Telephone: 612.630.1000
Facsimile: 612.630.9626
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
MATTHEW P. MINSER, Bar No. 296344
mminser@sjlawcorp.com
ANA P. HALLMON, Bar No. 253309
ahallmon@sjlawcorp.com
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW
CORPORATION
1141 Harbor Bay Parkway, Suite 100
Alameda, CA 94502
Telephone: (510) 906-4710
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
ILWU Warehouse Welfare Trust, et al.
COURTNEY M. OSBORN, Bar No. 312011
cosborn@littler.com
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
333 Bush Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415.433.1940
Facsimile: 415.399.8490
Attorneys for Defendant
REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
ILWU WAREHOUSE WELFARE
TRUST; AND JAMES BEARD AND
LARRY MORRISON, as Trustees of the
ILWU Warehouse Welfare Trust,
Case No. 4:18-cv-02118-YGR
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
18
Plaintiffs,
19
v.
Date:
Time:
Place:
June 4, 2019
10:00 a.m.
Courtroom A, 15th Floor
20
REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.,
21
Defendant.
Complaint Filed: April 6, 2018
Trial Date: None Set
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C .
333 Bush Street, Fl. 34
San Francisco, CA
94104
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
Case No. 4:18-CV-02118-YGR
1
Subject to the approval of the Court, Defendant REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.
2
(“Defendant”) and Plaintiffs ILWU WAREHOUSE WELFARE TRUST, JAMES BEARD, AND
3
LARRY MORRISON (“Plaintiffs”), through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to the
4
following:
5
WHEREAS,
6
1.
7
had been set by the Court for March 22, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.;
2.
8
9
On March 1, 2019, the Parties received notice that the Settlement Conference
On March 11, 2019, the Parties received notice that the Settlement Conference
had been reset by the Court from March 22, 2019 to April 19, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.;
10
2.
The Defendant had a substitution of counsel on April 3, 2019;
11
3.
The parties have checked the Court’s availability and request that the Court
12
continue the Settlement Conference from April 19, 2019 to June 4, 2019.
13
THEREFORE,
14
Subject to approval by the Court, Defendant and Plaintiff stipulate to continue the
15
Settlement Conference, and propose the following new date: June 4, 2019.
.
16
17
18
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
Dated:
April 17, 2019
Respectfully submitted,
19
/s/ Courtney M. Osborn
Courtney M. Osborn
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant
20
21
22
Dated:
April 17, 2019
Respectfully submitted,
23
/s/ Matthew P. Minser
Matthew P. Minser
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, ILWU Warehouse
Welfare Trust, et al.
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C .
333 Bush Street, Fl. 34
San Francisco, CA
94104
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
1.
Case No. 4:18-CV-02118-YGR
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3 The Settlement Conference is continued to June 4, 2019 @ 10:00 a.m.
4
Dated: April _____, 2019
17
5
THOMAS S. HIXON
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7 Settlement Conference Statements shall be lodged no later than May 28, 2019.
8
FIRMWIDE:163920512.2 068119.1792
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C .
333 Bush Street, Fl. 34
San Francisco, CA
94104
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
2.
Case No. 4:18-CV-02118-YGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?