Mocha Mill, Inc. et al v. Port of Mokha, Inc. et al

Filing 22

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 21 Stipulation To Extend Time For Defendants To Answer Or Respond To The Complaint Under Civil Local Rule 6-1, And For Briefing Schedule On Motion To Dismiss. Motions due by 6/25/2018, Responses due by 7/25/2018, Replies due by 8/8/2018, and Motion Hearing set for 8/23/2018 02:00 PM before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

MOCHA MILL, INC., MONK OF MOCHA
SPECIALTY COFFEE PRODUCTION AND
EXPORT, INC., IBRAHIM A. ALAELI,
YASIR H. KHANSHALI, and ADNAN G.
AWNALLAH,

)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
PORT OF MOKHA, INC., PORT OF MOKHA )
LLC, MOKHA FOUNATION, BLUE
)
BOTTLE COFFEE, INC., METRA
)
COMPUTER GROUP FZCO, T&H
)
COMPUTERS, INC., MOKHTAR F.
)
ALKHANSHALI, and IBRAHIM AHMAD
)
IBRAHIM,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Courtroom 2

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR
RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT UNDER
CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1, AND FOR
BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO
DISMISS

Complaint Filed:
Complaint Served:

25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATION RE
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG

04/30/2018
05/03/2018

1

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

2

On May 18, 2018, Plaintiffs Mocha Mill, Inc., Monk of Mocha Specialty Coffee Production and

3

Export, Inc., Ibrahim A. Alaeli, Yasir H. Khanshali, and Adnan G. Awnallah (collectively, the

4

“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Blue Bottle Coffee, Inc,. Port of Mokha, Inc. Port of Mokha LLC, Mokha

5

Foundation, Mokhtar Alkhanshali, and Ibrahim Ahmad Ibrahim (“Defendants,” and all collectively, the

6

“Parties”) filed a Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants to Answer or Respond to the Complaint

7

under Civil Local Rule 6-1, and for Briefing Schedule on Motion to Dismiss. This Court, having

8

reviewed the stipulation, adopts the Parties’ proposed schedule as follows:

9

1.

The deadline for Defendants to answer or respond to the Complaint shall be extended

10

until June 25, 2018, which will not alter the date of any other event or deadline already fixed by court

11

order;

12
13

2.

In the event that any of the Defendants responds to the Complaint by filing a Rule 12

motion, the Parties agree that the motion shall be briefed as follows:

14

(a) the motion shall be filed on or before June 25, 2018;

15

(b) any opposition shall be filed on or before July 25, 2018;

16

(c) any reply shall be filed on or before August 8, 2018.

17

(d) The motion shall be set on the Court’s calendar for argument on August 23, 2018 at

18
19

2:00 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21
22
23

Dated: May 21, 2018

_______________________________________
HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

24
25
26
27
28

-1ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATION RE
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG