Mocha Mill, Inc. et al v. Port of Mokha, Inc. et al

Filing 38

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 37 Stipulation Extending Page Limits on Motion to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6

MARK R. CONRAD (CA Bar No. 255667)
CONRAD & METLITZKY LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Port of Mokha, Inc.,
Port of Mokha, LLC, Mokha Foundation,
Mokhtar Alkhanshali, and Ibrahim Ahmad Ibrahim

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

OAKLAND DIVISION

11
12

MOCHA MILL, INC., et al.,

13
14
15
16

Plaintiffs,
v.

CASE NO. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITS
ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PORT OF MOKHA, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG

STIP RE MOTION TO DISMISS PAGE LIMITS

1

WHEREAS, on April 30, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint in this action, see ECF No. 1;

2

WHEREAS, on June 4, 2018, Plaintiffs file an Amended Complaint in this action, ECF No. 24;

3

WHEREAS, the parties to this action have previously stipulated to, and the Court has ordered, an

4 extended briefing schedule on forthcoming motions to dismiss to be filed by the defendants, with the
5 motions to be heard on September 27, 2108, see ECF Nos. 22, 25 & 26, 29 & 31;
6

WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint asserts thirteen separate causes of action against each of

7 Defendants Port of Mokha, Inc., Port of Mokha, LLC, Mokha Foundation, Mokhtar Alkhanshali, and
8 Ibrahim Ahmad Ibrahim (“Stipulating Defendants”);
9

WHEREAS, in order to provide the Court with sufficient briefing and background to respond to

10 the Amended Complaint on behalf of the Stipulating Defendants, undersigned counsel for the
11 Stipulating Defendants requests leave to file a memorandum in support of their motion to dismiss that
12 exceeds the default page limits set forth in Northern District Civil Local Rules 7-2 and 7-3;
13

WHEREAS, undersigned counsel for the Stipulating Defendants and for Plaintiffs have met and

14 conferred and have agreed to the filing of overlength briefs as follows;
15

NOW, THEREFORE, the Stipulating Defendants and Plaintiffs hereby stipulate and agree that

16 the page limits with respect to Stipulating Defendants’ forthcoming motion to dismiss shall be enlarged
17 as follows: forty (40) pages for Stipulating Defendants’ opening brief, forty pages (40) for Plaintiffs’
18 opposition brief, and twenty (20) pages for Stipulating Defendants’ reply brief.
19
20

Respectfully submitted,

21 DATED: July 10, 2018

CONRAD & METLITZKY LLP

22
23
/s/ Mark R. Conrad
MARK R. CONRAD
Attorneys for Defendants Port of Mokha, Inc.,
Port of Mokha, LLC, Mokha Foundation,
Mokhtar Alkhanshali, and Ibrahim Ahmad Ibrahim

24
25
26
27
28

-1Case No. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG

STIP RE MOTION TO DISMISS PAGE LIMITS

1 DATED: July 10, 2018

ALMADANI LAW

2
3
/s/ Yasin M. Almadani
YASIN M. ALMADANI
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

4
5
6
7
8
9

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITS
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION between Plaintiffs and Defendants Port of Mokha, Inc., Port of

10 Mokha, LLC, Mokha Foundation, Mokhtar Alkhanshali, and Ibrahim Ahmad Ibrahim (“Stipulating
11 Defendants”), the limits on Stipulating Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be forty (40) pages for the
12 opening brief, forty (40) pages for the opposition brief, and twenty (20) pages for the reply brief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

S

UNIT
ED

7/11/2018
15 DATED: _____________________

RT
U
O

14

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

NO

18

RT

19

Jud

ER

21

S. Gillia

m Jr.

A

H

20

ood
g e H ay w

FO

17

R NIA

HON. HAYWOODIS.D
E GILLIAM, JR.
United States DEN Judge
District

16

LI

13

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2Case No. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG

STIP RE MOTION TO DISMISS PAGE LIMITS