Fridman v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Filing 56

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 55 Stipulation Re 49 MOTION to Compel Arbitration. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2018)

1

  David S. Ratner, Esq.

2

  David Ratner Law Firm, LLP

3

4

[e-mail]

33 Julianne Court

5
6
7

Walnut Creek, CA 94595
Telephone: [phone]

8

Fax: [phone]

9

Attorney for Plaintiffs and the Classes

10

[Additional counsel appearing on signature page]

11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
MICHAEL FRIDMAN, et al.,

Case No. 4:18-cv-02815-HSG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
EXTENDING TIME WITHIN WHICH
TO RESPOND AND REPLY TO
MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
AND TO STAY

14
15
v.

16

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

17

Defendants.

18
19

Judge:

20

Complaint Filed: May 13, 2018

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

1

2

3

4

ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation Extending Time to Respond and
Reply to Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay. The Court, having considered the parties’

Stipulation, finds good cause in support thereof.

5

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

6
7

Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to the motion to compel arbitration and to stay shall be on
Friday, October 5, 2018.

8
9

Defendant’s deadline to reply to the motion to compel arbitration and to stay shall be on
Friday, October 19, 2018.

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

DATED: October 1, 2018

14
15
16
17

18

19
20
21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

_________________________
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge