Johnson v. Sarraf et al
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Brigitte W. Sarraf, Eskander Sarraf, Scott Johnson, Vive Sol, Inc. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/24/18. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2018)
ER
7/24/2018
H
7
alez Rog
N
ers
F
D IS T IC T O
R
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
R NIA
nz
onne Go
Judge Yv
FO
S
RT
6
Attorneys for Defendants
ESKANDER SARRAF, BRIGITTE W. SARRAF,
and VIVE SOL, INC.
NO
5
LI
4
TED
GRAN
A
3
UNIT
ED
2
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Julia N. Sarnoff (SBN 288531)
jsarnoff@seyfarth.com
975 F St. N.W.
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone:
(202) 463-2400
Facsimile:
(202) 828-5393
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
C
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
Scott Johnson,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
18
Eskander Sarraf, in individual and
representative capacity as trustee of the
Eskander Sarraf and Brigitte W. Sarraf
Revocable Living Trust;
Brigitte W. Sarraf, in individual and
representative capacity as trustee of the
Eskander Sarraf and Brigitte W. Sarraf
Revocable Living Trust; Vive Sol, Inc., a
California Corporation; and Does 1-10,
19
Defendants.
15
16
17
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:18-cv-02977-YGR
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Complaint Filed: May 21, 2018
Complaint Served: May 30, 2018 (Vive Sol, Inc.);
May 31, 2018 (Eskander Sarraf and Brigitte W.
Sarraf)
Current Response Date: July 20, 2018
New Response Date: August 3, 2018
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 4:18-CV-02977-YGR
1
Plaintiff Scott Johnson (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Eskander Sarraf, Brigitte W. Sarraf, and
2
Vive Sol, Inc. (“Defendants”) jointly stipulate to extend the time for Defendants to respond to the
3
Complaint from July 20, 2018 August 3, 2018.
4
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), this extension will not alter the date of any event or any
5
deadline already fixed by Court order. This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of
6
causing unwarranted delay. The parties are actively discussing settlement, and require additional time to
7
consider settlement options. This is Defendants’ second request for an extension.
8
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: July 19, 2018
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
10
11
By /s/ Julia N. Sarnoff
Julia N. Sarnoff
12
Attorneys for Defendants
ESKANDER SARRAF, BRIGITTE W. SARRAF, and
VIVE SOL, INC.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
DATED: July 19, 2018
CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS
By
/s/ Chris Carson
Chris Carson
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SCOTT JOHNSON
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 4:18-CV-02977-YGR
1
2
3
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(I)(3)
I, Julia N. Sarnoff, attest that concurrence in the filing of this stipulation has been obtained from
the signatory Chris Carson, counsel for Plaintiff.
4
5
DATED: July 19, 2018
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
6
By:
7
/s/ Julia N. Sarnoff
Julia N. Sarnoff
Attorneys for Defendants
ESKANDER SARRAF, BRIGITTE W.
SARRAF, and VIVE SOL, INC.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 4:18-CV-02977-YGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?