Johnson v. Sarraf et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Brigitte W. Sarraf, Eskander Sarraf, Scott Johnson, Vive Sol, Inc. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/24/18. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2018)

Download PDF
ER 7/24/2018 H 7 alez Rog N ers F D IS T IC T O R 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 R NIA nz onne Go Judge Yv FO S RT 6 Attorneys for Defendants ESKANDER SARRAF, BRIGITTE W. SARRAF, and VIVE SOL, INC. NO 5 LI 4 TED GRAN A 3 UNIT ED 2 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Julia N. Sarnoff (SBN 288531) jsarnoff@seyfarth.com 975 F St. N.W. Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: (202) 463-2400 Facsimile: (202) 828-5393 RT U O 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA C NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Scott Johnson, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. 18 Eskander Sarraf, in individual and representative capacity as trustee of the Eskander Sarraf and Brigitte W. Sarraf Revocable Living Trust; Brigitte W. Sarraf, in individual and representative capacity as trustee of the Eskander Sarraf and Brigitte W. Sarraf Revocable Living Trust; Vive Sol, Inc., a California Corporation; and Does 1-10, 19 Defendants. 15 16 17 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:18-cv-02977-YGR SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Complaint Filed: May 21, 2018 Complaint Served: May 30, 2018 (Vive Sol, Inc.); May 31, 2018 (Eskander Sarraf and Brigitte W. Sarraf) Current Response Date: July 20, 2018 New Response Date: August 3, 2018 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. 4:18-CV-02977-YGR 1 Plaintiff Scott Johnson (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Eskander Sarraf, Brigitte W. Sarraf, and 2 Vive Sol, Inc. (“Defendants”) jointly stipulate to extend the time for Defendants to respond to the 3 Complaint from July 20, 2018 August 3, 2018. 4 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), this extension will not alter the date of any event or any 5 deadline already fixed by Court order. This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of 6 causing unwarranted delay. The parties are actively discussing settlement, and require additional time to 7 consider settlement options. This is Defendants’ second request for an extension. 8 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: July 19, 2018 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 10 11 By /s/ Julia N. Sarnoff Julia N. Sarnoff 12 Attorneys for Defendants ESKANDER SARRAF, BRIGITTE W. SARRAF, and VIVE SOL, INC. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 DATED: July 19, 2018 CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS By /s/ Chris Carson Chris Carson Attorneys for Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. 4:18-CV-02977-YGR 1 2 3 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(I)(3) I, Julia N. Sarnoff, attest that concurrence in the filing of this stipulation has been obtained from the signatory Chris Carson, counsel for Plaintiff. 4 5 DATED: July 19, 2018 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 6 By: 7 /s/ Julia N. Sarnoff Julia N. Sarnoff Attorneys for Defendants ESKANDER SARRAF, BRIGITTE W. SARRAF, and VIVE SOL, INC. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. 4:18-CV-02977-YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?