Center for Environmental Health et al v. Pruitt et al
Filing
126
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg for Judge Saundra B. Armstrong Granting 124 Motion for Extension of Time to File A Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees and Litigation Expenses. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2022)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Jonathan Evans (CA Bar No. 247376)
Center for Biological Diversity
1212 Broadway Street, Suite 800
Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 844-7100 ext. 318
jevans@biologicaldiversity.org
Stephanie Parent (OR Bar No. 925908)*
Center for Biological Diversity
P.O. Box 11374
Portland, OR 97211-0374
(971) 717-6404
sparent@biologicaldiversity.org
9
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
*Admitted pro hac vice
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
OAKLAND DIVISION
14
15
16
CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH, et al.,
17
Plaintiffs,
18
v.
19
21
MICHAEL S. REGAN, in his official
capacity as Administrator of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, et al.,
22
Defendants,
20
23
24
and
CROPLIFE AMERICA,
25
26
27
Intervenor-Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 4:18-cv-03197-SBA
JOINT UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
EXTEND TIME TO FILE A MOTION FOR
AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND
LITIGATION EXPENSES;
ORDER
28
1
1
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Civil Local Rule 6-3 Plaintiffs
2
(Center for Environmental Health, Center for Biological Diversity, and Californians for Pesticide
3
Reform) and Federal Defendants (Michael S. Regan, Administrator of the U.S. Environmental
4
Protection Agency (“EPA”), the EPA, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Deb Haaland,
5
Secretary of the Interior) hereby file this joint motion to extend the time for Plaintiffs to file a
6
motion for attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses to 90 days from the entry of an order on the
7
Parties’ Second Stipulated Partial Settlement Agreement (“Second Settlement”). Dkt. 123.
8
This extension would allow the Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants time to attempt to
9
resolve the matter of attorneys’ fees and costs without Court involvement. The parties have
10
conferred and Defendant-Intervenor CropLife America does not oppose the relief sought in this
11
joint motion.
12
Under the applicable rules and attorney-fee award provisions of the Endangered Species
13
Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g)(1)(C), Plaintiffs must file a motion for attorneys’ fees and bill of costs
14
within fourteen (14) days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d); Civil L.R 54-1(a); Civil
15
L.R. 54-5(a). According to the terms of the Second Settlement, that time begins to run from
16
when the Court enters the Parties’ proposed order on the Second Settlement. Dkt. 123, ¶ 16. The
17
Equal Access to Justice Act further provides that “[a] party seeking an award of fees and other
18
expenses shall, within thirty days of final judgment in the action, submit to the court an
19
application for fees and other expenses.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B). The Supreme Court has
20
held that the EAJA filing deadline is not jurisdictional. Scarborough v. Principi, 541 U.S. 401,
21
413-14 (2004); see also New Life Evangelistic Ctr., Inc. v. Sebelius, 847 F. Supp. 2d 50, 53
22
(D.D.C. 2012).
23
The Parties negotiated a first stipulated partial settlement agreement regarding claims
24
against EPA, Administrator Regan, FWS, and Secretary Haaland, without any admission of the
25
allegations or claims, for the alleged violation of their procedural duties concerning completion
26
of the Final Biological Opinion pursuant to ESA Section 7(a)(2) in Counts 1 and 2 set forth in
27
the complaint. Dkt. 111. The Court entered an order effectuating the first stipulated partial
28
2
1
settlement on January 4, 2022, and retained jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement
2
agreement. Dkt. 112.
3
The Parties negotiated a Second Settlement with regard to the remaining claims against
4
the EPA and Administrator Regan for the alleged failure to comply with their substantive duties
5
under ESA Section 7(a)(2) by taking final agency actions of registering or reregistering certain
6
products containing malathion in paragraph 84 of the complaint as set forth in Count 1; the
7
alleged unlawful withholding and/or unreasonable delay pursuant to Section 706(1) of the
8
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706(1), of completion of their substantive duties under
9
ESA Section 7(a)(2) as set forth in Count 2; and the alleged violations of ESA Section 7(d), 16
10
11
12
13
U.S.C. § 1536(d), as set forth in Count 3. Dkt. 123.
Having resolved all of the claims in the complaint the only outstanding issues remaining
in this case are related to Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and costs.
Plaintiffs have fourteen (14) days from the entry of judgment to file any bill of costs and
14
motion for attorneys’ fees and litigation costs pursuant to the ESA. Civil L.R. 54-1(a); Civil L.R.
15
54-5(a); 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g)(4). Under EAJA, Plaintiffs have thirty (30) days from the final
16
judgment to submit an application for fees and expenses. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B).
17
To provide additional time for Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants to resolve the matter of
18
attorneys’ fees and litigation costs absent any further involvement from this Court, Plaintiffs and
19
Federal Defendants respectfully request that the Court extend the time for Plaintiffs to file any
20
such motion for 90 days from the Court’s entry of an order on the Second Settlement. Providing
21
the parties additional time to attempt to resolve the issue of attorneys’ fees and costs would
22
reduce or avoid waste of resources to the Parties and the Court that would be incurred by
23
unnecessary motion practice and additional costs. The requested time modification would
24
extend by 76 days the deadline for filing the motion for attorneys’ fees and costs, and may
25
ultimately allow for faster and more efficient resolution of issues surrounding fees and costs.
26
By agreeing to this request for additional time, Federal Defendants are not conceding that
27
Plaintiffs are entitled to fees. Federal Defendants reserve all rights and defense to entitlement and
28
reasonableness of any fee request. As set forth in the attached proposed order, the parties request
3
1
that this Court order them to provide a status update on the resolution of Plaintiffs’ attorneys’
2
fees and litigation costs or for Plaintiffs to file their motion for such fees and costs, if such a
3
motion is necessary within 90 days of the entry of the order effectuating the Second Stipulated
4
Partial Settlement Agreement.
5
6
Respectfully submitted this 12th day of April, 2022.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
/s/ Jonathan Evans
Jonathan Evans
Center for Biological Diversity
1212 Broadway Street, Suite 800
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: 510-844-7100, ext. 318
jevans@biologicaldiversity.org
TODD KIM
Assistant Attorney General
Environment & Natural Resources Division
SETH M. BARSKY, Chief
MEREDITH L. FLAX, Assistant Chief
Stephanie Parent
Center for Biological Diversity
P.O. Box 11374
Portland, OR 97211-0374
Tel: 971-717-6404
/s/ Alison Finnegan
ALISON C. FINNEGAN, Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
Environment & Natural Resources Division
Wildlife & Marine Resources Section
Ben Franklin Station
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, DC 20044-7611
Tel: (202) 305-0500 Fax: (202) 305-0275
Counsel for Plaintiffs
Counsel for Federal Defendants
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
1
2
3
ORDER
On April 7, 2022, the parties submitted a Second Settlement Agreement in the above
captioned case resolving any remaining claims in Counts 1, 2, and 3 of the complaint.
4
Good cause having been shown, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ deadline to file a
5
motion for attorneys’ fees and costs and a bill of costs shall be extended to ninety (90) days from
6
the Court’s order effectuating the Second Stipulated Partial Settlement Agreement.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
Dated: April 13, 2022
RS
___________________________________
Richard Seeborg for Saundra Brown Armstrong
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?