Hernandez v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.
Filing
29
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 27 Stipulation for Leave to File First Amended Complaint.Amended Pleadings due by 12/17/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2018)
1 BRYAN J. MCCORMACK (SBN 192418)
bryan@mcelawfirm.com
2 MCCORMACK & ERLICH, LLP
150 Post Street, Suite 742
3 San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: (415) 296-8420
4 Facsimile: (415) 296-8552
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff
6
JAMES HERNANDEZ
CRAIG D. NICKERSON (SBN: 215067)
7 cnickerson@grsm.com
MARSHALL R. LURTZ (SBN: 296254)
8 mlurtz@grsm.com
GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP
9 633 West Fifth Street, 52nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
10 Telephone: (213) 576-5092
11
Facsimile: (213) 680-4470
Attorneys for Defendant
12 BAKER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16 JAMES HERNANDEZ
CASE NO.: 4:18-cv-03226-HSG
17
Assigned to Hon. Judge Haywood S.
Gilliam, Jr.
18
Plaintiff,
v.
19 BAKER CONCRETE
CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Ohio
20 Corporation,
21
22
Defendants.
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Complaint Filed: May 30, 2018
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Case No. 4:18-cv-03226-HSG
1
The parties, Plaintiff James Hernandez (“Plaintiff) and Defendant Baker Concrete
2 Construction, Inc. (“Defendant”), hereby stipulate to allow Plaintiff to file its First Amended
3 Complaint, which is attached hereto and lodged herewith as Exhibit A (“First Amended
4 Complaint”).
5
WHEREAS, Plaintiff represents that the proposed First Amended Complaint arises out of
6 the same transaction or series of transactions as Plaintiff’s claims already at issue in this action;
7
WHEREAS, Plaintiff represents that he has recently discovered new information that
8 forms the basis of the First Amended Complaint action and is acting in good faith in bringing the
9 proposed First Amended Complaint. Based on such, he has eliminated two causes of actions,
10 added three new causes of action, and added one defendant to the First Amended Complaint;
11
WHEREAS, Defendant does not oppose the filing of the proposed First Amended
12 Complaint as a procedural matter pursuant to this Stipulation, with the understanding and on the
13 basis that Defendant’s stipulation in this regard is without waiver of, or prejudice to, its rights,
14 defenses or positions in this action;
15
WHEREAS, Defendant will not be unduly prejudiced by the filing of the proposed First
16 Amended Complaint;
17
THEREFORE, subject to the approval of this Court, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree
18 as follows:
19
1. Defendant shall be granted leave to file the First Amended Complaint;
20
2. The First Amended Complaint shall be deemed filed and personally served on
21
22
23
Defendants as of the date that this Stipulation is approved by the Court; and
3. Any responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint shall be filed and served
within thirty (30) days after this Stipulation has been approved by the Court.
24 //
25 //
26 //
27 //
28
2
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Case No. 4:18-cv-03226-HSG
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
3 Dated: December 5, 2018
GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI
4
By: /s/ Craig D. Nickerson
Craig D. Nickerson
Marshall R. Lurtz
Attorneys for Defendant
Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.
5
6
7
8
9 Dated: December 5, 2018
McCormack and Erlich, LLP
10
By: /s/ Bryan J. McCormack
Bryan J. McCormack
Attorney for Plaintiff
James Hernandez
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.except the Plaintiff is directed
18 to e-file the first amended complaint on the docket by the close of business today, December 17th.
19
20 Dated: 12/17/2018
21
Hon. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Case No. 4:18-cv-03226-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?