Hernandez v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.

Filing 29

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 27 Stipulation for Leave to File First Amended Complaint.Amended Pleadings due by 12/17/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2018)

Download PDF
1 BRYAN J. MCCORMACK (SBN 192418) bryan@mcelawfirm.com 2 MCCORMACK & ERLICH, LLP 150 Post Street, Suite 742 3 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 296-8420 4 Facsimile: (415) 296-8552 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 JAMES HERNANDEZ CRAIG D. NICKERSON (SBN: 215067) 7 cnickerson@grsm.com MARSHALL R. LURTZ (SBN: 296254) 8 mlurtz@grsm.com GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 9 633 West Fifth Street, 52nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 10 Telephone: (213) 576-5092 11 Facsimile: (213) 680-4470 Attorneys for Defendant 12 BAKER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 JAMES HERNANDEZ CASE NO.: 4:18-cv-03226-HSG 17 Assigned to Hon. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 18 Plaintiff, v. 19 BAKER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Ohio 20 Corporation, 21 22 Defendants. STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER Complaint Filed: May 30, 2018 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:18-cv-03226-HSG 1 The parties, Plaintiff James Hernandez (“Plaintiff) and Defendant Baker Concrete 2 Construction, Inc. (“Defendant”), hereby stipulate to allow Plaintiff to file its First Amended 3 Complaint, which is attached hereto and lodged herewith as Exhibit A (“First Amended 4 Complaint”). 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiff represents that the proposed First Amended Complaint arises out of 6 the same transaction or series of transactions as Plaintiff’s claims already at issue in this action; 7 WHEREAS, Plaintiff represents that he has recently discovered new information that 8 forms the basis of the First Amended Complaint action and is acting in good faith in bringing the 9 proposed First Amended Complaint. Based on such, he has eliminated two causes of actions, 10 added three new causes of action, and added one defendant to the First Amended Complaint; 11 WHEREAS, Defendant does not oppose the filing of the proposed First Amended 12 Complaint as a procedural matter pursuant to this Stipulation, with the understanding and on the 13 basis that Defendant’s stipulation in this regard is without waiver of, or prejudice to, its rights, 14 defenses or positions in this action; 15 WHEREAS, Defendant will not be unduly prejudiced by the filing of the proposed First 16 Amended Complaint; 17 THEREFORE, subject to the approval of this Court, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree 18 as follows: 19 1. Defendant shall be granted leave to file the First Amended Complaint; 20 2. The First Amended Complaint shall be deemed filed and personally served on 21 22 23 Defendants as of the date that this Stipulation is approved by the Court; and 3. Any responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint shall be filed and served within thirty (30) days after this Stipulation has been approved by the Court. 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 2 STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:18-cv-03226-HSG 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 3 Dated: December 5, 2018 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI 4 By: /s/ Craig D. Nickerson Craig D. Nickerson Marshall R. Lurtz Attorneys for Defendant Baker Concrete Construction, Inc. 5 6 7 8 9 Dated: December 5, 2018 McCormack and Erlich, LLP 10 By: /s/ Bryan J. McCormack Bryan J. McCormack Attorney for Plaintiff James Hernandez 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.except the Plaintiff is directed 18 to e-file the first amended complaint on the docket by the close of business today, December 17th. 19 20 Dated: 12/17/2018 21 Hon. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:18-cv-03226-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?