State of California et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al

Filing 118

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 117 Stipulation to Continue Hearing on EPA's 109 Motion to Amend Order and Judgment Re Docket No. 115 . (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2019)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 OAKLAND DIVISION 4 5 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., v. 8 10 ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING Plaintiffs, 7 9 Case No. 4:18-cv-03237-HSG UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Judge Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Defendants. 11 12 ORDER 13 BEFORE THE COURT is the Joint Stipulation Regarding Hearing on EPA’s Motion to 14 15 Amend Order and Judgment, by Plaintiffs the States of California, by and through the Attorney 16 General and the California Air Resources Board; Illinois; Maryland; New Mexico; Oregon; 17 Rhode Island; and Vermont; and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, by and through the 18 Attorney General and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, together with 19 Plaintiff-Intervenor Environmental Defense Fund, and Defendants United States Environmental 20 Protection Agency (EPA) and Andrew R. Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator of the 21 EPA. 22 For good cause shown and after consideration of the stipulation, the Court hereby orders I that the hearing on EPA’s motion to amend order and judgmentSTRINo. 109) be continued to ES D (Dkt. CT 24 ____________________________. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. R NIA UNIT ED D LI ay w E A H 1 J u d ge H FO _________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. r. illiam UNITED STATES oDISTRICT JJUDGE o d S. G RT 28 Dated: 9/26/2019 C DENIE NO 27 T TA RT U O 26 S 23 C RN Order Regarding Joint Stipulation to Continue Hearing (4:18-cv-03237-HSG) F D IS T IC T O R

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?