State of California et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
Filing
118
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 117 Stipulation to Continue Hearing on EPA's 109 Motion to Amend Order and Judgment Re Docket No. 115 . (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2019)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
OAKLAND DIVISION
4
5
6
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
v.
8
10
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE HEARING
Plaintiffs,
7
9
Case No. 4:18-cv-03237-HSG
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, et al.,
Judge Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Defendants.
11
12
ORDER
13
BEFORE THE COURT is the Joint Stipulation Regarding Hearing on EPA’s Motion to
14
15
Amend Order and Judgment, by Plaintiffs the States of California, by and through the Attorney
16
General and the California Air Resources Board; Illinois; Maryland; New Mexico; Oregon;
17
Rhode Island; and Vermont; and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, by and through the
18
Attorney General and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, together with
19
Plaintiff-Intervenor Environmental Defense Fund, and Defendants United States Environmental
20
Protection Agency (EPA) and Andrew R. Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator of the
21
EPA.
22
For good cause shown and after consideration of the stipulation, the Court hereby orders
I
that the hearing on EPA’s motion to amend order and judgmentSTRINo. 109) be continued to
ES D (Dkt. CT
24
____________________________.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
R NIA
UNIT
ED
D
LI
ay w
E
A
H
1
J u d ge H
FO
_________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. r.
illiam
UNITED STATES oDISTRICT JJUDGE
o d S. G
RT
28
Dated: 9/26/2019
C
DENIE
NO
27
T
TA
RT
U
O
26
S
23
C
RN
Order Regarding Joint Stipulation to Continue Hearing (4:18-cv-03237-HSG)
F
D IS T IC T O
R
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?