State of California et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al

Filing 67

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 66 Motion to Appear by Telephone at Case Management Conference and Motion to Dismiss Hearing. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2018)

Download PDF
6 HECTOR BALDERAS Attorney General of New Mexico BILL GRANTHAM (admitted pro hac vice) Assistant Attorney General New Mexico Office of the Attorney General 201 Third Street NW, Suite 300 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 717-3520 wgrantham@nmag.gov 7 Attorneys for the State of New Mexico 1 2 3 4 5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 9 10 11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Defendants Case No. 4:18-cv-03237-HSG NEW MEXICO’S REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND MOTION TO DISMISS HEARING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Conference: October 25, 2018 Time: 2:00 p.m. Courtroom: 2, 4th Floor, Oakland Courthouse 18 19 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-10(a), Plaintiff the State of New Mexico requests an 20 order allowing counsel to appear telephonically for the Initial Case Management 21 Conference (CMC) currently set for October 25, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2, 4th 22 Floor (Dkt. No. 63) and the concurrently scheduled hearing on the motion to dismiss 23 (Dkt. No. 28) (hearing). The Court previously granted such an order with respect to the 24 CMC before it was rescheduled from October 2 to October 25. (Dkt. No. 60). 25 New Mexico is one of several State Plaintiffs in this matter (States). Counsel for 26 the State of California plans to attend the CMC and hearing in person and is authorized to 27 speak for New Mexico and all other States. Regardless, counsel for New Mexico would 28 NEW MEXICO’S REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY FOR CMC/MTD HEARING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 4:18-cv-03237-HSG 1 like to participate in the CMC and hearing and respectfully requests to appear by 2 telephone. 3 Counsel makes this request because counsel is not local and would like to save 4 costs—which are funded by taxpayer monies—that would be required to attend the CMC 5 and hearing in person; (2) the CMC is likely to be of short duration; (3) counsel for all 6 parties have discussed the relevant issues at length and do not believe there will be 7 significant disputes for the Court to resolve; (4) with respect to the motion to dismiss, 8 because New Mexico’s interests align entirely with California’s it is anticipated that 9 separate presentation by counsel for New Mexico will be minimal, if even necessary. 10 Therefore, New Mexico respectfully requests that the undersigned counsel be 11 allowed to appear and participate telephonically at the October 2, 2018 initial CMC. 12 Dated: October 18, 2018 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bill Grantham BILL GRANTHAM (admitted pro hac vice) Assistant Attorney General 201 Third Street NW, Suite 300 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 717-3520 wgrantham@nmag.gov Attorney for New Mexico 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NEW MEXICO’S REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY FOR CMC/MTD HEARING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 4:18-cv-03237-HSG 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Before the Court is New Mexico’s Request to Appear Telephonically for the 3 Initial Case Management Conference (“CMC”) for October 25, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. in 4 Courtroom 2, 4th Floor (Dkt. No. 63) and the concurrent hearing on the motion to dismiss 5 (Dkt. No. 28). Upon due consideration, and for good cause shown, New Mexico’s 6 request is hereby GRANTED. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to 7 make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. 8 . 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 DATED this ______ day of October, 2018. 22nd 11 12 13 ________________________________ HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 4:18-CV-03237-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?