State of California et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al

Filing 72

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 71 Stipulation re EPA's 70 Motion to Stay. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California GARY E. TAVETIAN, SBN 117135 DAVID A. ZONANA, SBN 196029 Supervising Deputy Attorneys General TIMOTHY E. SULLIVAN, SBN 197054 ELIZABETH B. RUMSEY, SBN 257908 JULIA K. FORGIE, SBN 304701 Deputy Attorneys General 1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 879-0860 liz.rumsey@doj.ca.gov For Plaintiffs the State of California and the California Air Resources Board JONATHAN D. BRIGHTBILL Deputy Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice LESLIE M. HILL (D.C. Bar No. 476008) Leslie.Hill@usdoj.gov Environmental Defense Section 601 D Street N.W., Suite 8000 Washington D.C. 20004 Telephone (202) 514-0375 Facsimile (202) 514-8865 Attorneys for Defendants IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 22 23 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al. Plaintiffs, 24 25 26 27 28 v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Case No. 4:18-cv-03237-HSG JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR EPA’S MOTION TO STAY CASE PENDING CONCLUSION OF RULEMAKING Defendants. JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY CASE PENDING CONCLUSION OF RULEMAKING CASE NO. 4:18-CV-03237-HSG 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, Plaintiffs States of California, by and through the 2 Attorney General and the California Air Resources Board; Illinois; Maryland; New 3 Mexico; Oregon; Rhode Island; and Vermont; and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 4 by and through the Attorney General and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental 5 Protection (hereinafter “States”), and Defendants United States Environmental Protection 6 Agency and Andrew R. Wheeler, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the 7 EPA (“EPA”), hereby stipulate to and respectfully request that the Court enter an order 8 setting a briefing schedule for EPA’s motion to stay this case pending conclusion of 9 rulemaking. In support of this stipulation, the parties state as follows: 10 1. At hearing on October 25, 2018, the Court heard EPA’s motion to dismiss 11 the States’ complaint (Dkt. No. 28), as well as the motion of proposed Plaintiff Intervenor 12 Environmental Defense Fund to intervene in the matter (Dkt. No. 36). The Court has not 13 yet ruled on either motion. 14 15 16 2. On November 6, 2018, EPA moved to stay the case pending conclusion of a related rulemaking (Dkt. No. 70). 3. The parties respectfully request that the Court set the following briefing 17 schedule for the motion to stay, which takes into account Plaintiffs’ intention to file its 18 response earlier than required by Civil L.R. 7-3(a): 19 20 21 Document Due Date States’ Opposition to EPA’s Motion On or before November 13, 2018 EPA’s Reply in Support of its Motion November 16, 2018 if the States’ brief is filed on November 9, 2018 and November 20, 2018 if the States’ brief is filed on November 13, 2018 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY CASE PENDING CONCLUSION OF RULEMAKING CASE NO. 4:18-CV-03237-HSG 1 4. The States assert that time is of the essence in deciding this motion and 2 thus intend to request that the Court decide the motion on the papers or, in the event the 3 Court believes a hearing is necessary, to hear the motion as soon as possible. 4 5 The parties stipulate to and request that the Court enter the attached proposed order. 6 7 Respectfully submitted, 8 Date: November 6, 2018 9 10 JONATHAN D. BRIGHTBILL Deputy Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division 16 /s/ Leslie M. Hill (email auth. 11/5/18) LESLIE M. HILL (D.C. Bar No. 476008) U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section 601 D Street N.W., Suite 8000 Washington D.C. 20004 Leslie.Hill@usdoj.gov Telephone (202) 514-0375 Facsimile (202) 514-8865 17 Attorneys for Defendant 11 12 13 14 15 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date: November 6, 2018 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California GARY E. TAVETIAN DAVID A. ZONANA Supervising Deputy Attorneys General TIMOTHY E. SULLIVAN JULIA K. FORGIE Deputy Attorneys General /s/ Elizabeth B. Rumsey ELIZABETH B. RUMSEY Deputy Attorney General 1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 879-0860 liz.rumsey@doj.ca.gov JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY CASE PENDING CONCLUSION OF RULEMAKING CASE NO. 4:18-CV-03237-HSG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the STATE OF ILLINOIS For the STATE OF MARYLAND LISA MADIGAN Attorney General of Illinois DANIEL I. ROTTENBERG (pro hac vice admission pending) Assistant Attorney General Environmental Bureau Illinois Attorney General’s Office 69 W. Washington St., 18th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60602 (312) 814-3816 DRottenberg@atg.state.il.us BRIAN E. FROSH Attorney General of Maryland LEAH J. TULIN (pro hac vice admission pending) Assistant Attorney General 200 St. Paul Place Baltimore, Maryland 21202 (410) 576-6962 ltulin@oag.state.md.us For the STATE OF NEW MEXICO 11 HECTOR BALDERAS 12 Attorney General of New Mexico 13 BILL GRANTHAM (pro hac vice admission pending) 14 Assistant Attorney General 201 Third Street NW, Suite 300 15 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 16 (505) 717-3520 wgrantham@nmag.gov 17 18 19 For the COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOSH SHAPIRO Attorney General of Pennsylvania MICHAEL J. FISCHER (pro hac vice admission pending) Chief Deputy Attorney General ROBERT A. REILEY (pro hac vice admission pending) Assistant Director, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 (215) 560-2171 mfischer@attorneygeneral.gov For the STATE OF OREGON ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM Attorney General of Oregon PAUL GARRAHAN (pro hac vice admission pending) Attorney-in-Charge Natural Resources Section Oregon Department of Justice 1162 Court Street, N.E. Salem, Oregon 97301-4096 (503) 947-4342 paul.garrahan@doj.state.or.us For the STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PETER F. KILMARTIN Attorney General of Rhode Island GREGORY S. SCHULTZ (pro hac vice admission pending) Special Assistant Attorney General RI Department of Attorney General 150 South Main Street Providence, RI 02903 (401) 274-4400 gschultz@riag.ri.gov JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY CASE PENDING CONCLUSION OF RULEMAKING CASE NO. 4:18-CV-03237-HSG 1 For the STATE OF VERMONT 2 THOMAS J. DONOVAN, JR. Attorney General of Vermont NICHOLAS F. PERSAMPIERI (pro hac vice admission pending) Assistant Attorney General Office of the Vermont Attorney General 109 State Street Montpelier, Vermont 05609 (802) 828-3186 nick.persampieri@vermont.gov 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY CASE PENDING CONCLUSION OF RULEMAKING CASE NO. 4:18-CV-03237-HSG 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 BEFORE THE COURT is the Joint Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule for EPA’s Motion to Stay Case Pending Conclusion of Rulemaking submitted by Plaintiffs States of California, by and through the Attorney General and the California Air Resources Board; Illinois; Maryland; New Mexico; Oregon; Rhode Island; and Vermont; and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, by and through the Attorney General and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (“States”), and Defendants United States Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew R. Wheeler, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the EPA (“EPA”). Having reviewed the stipulation, it is HEREBY ORDERED that EPA’s Motion to Stay Case Pending Conclusion of Rulemaking (Dkt. No. 70) shall be briefed in accordance with the following schedule: Document Due Date 16 States’ Opposition to EPA’s Motion On or before November 13, 2018 17 EPA’s Reply in Support of its Motion November 16, 2018 (if the States’ brief is filed on November 9, 2018) or November 20, 2018 (if the States’ brief is filed on November 13, 2018) 15 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November ___, 2018 7 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 4:18-CV-03237-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?